Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school
- PMID: 23745087
- PMCID: PMC3661256
- DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S14383
Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school
Abstract
Introduction: International interest in peer-teaching and peer-assisted learning (PAL) during undergraduate medical programs has grown in recent years, reflected both in literature and in practice. There, remains however, a distinct lack of objective clarity and consensus on the true effectiveness of peer-teaching and its short- and long-term impacts on learning outcomes and clinical practice.
Objective: To summarize and critically appraise evidence presented on peer-teaching effectiveness and its impact on objective learning outcomes of medical students.
Method: A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases. Titles and abstracts were screened and selection was based on strict eligibility criteria after examining full-texts. Two reviewers used a standard review and analysis framework to independently extract data from each study. Discrepancies in opinions were resolved by discussion in consultation with other reviewers. Adapted models of "Kirkpatrick's Levels of Learning" were used to grade the impact size of study outcomes.
Results: From 127 potential titles, 41 were obtained as full-texts, and 19 selected after close examination and group deliberation. Fifteen studies focused on student-learner outcomes and four on student-teacher learning outcomes. Ten studies utilized randomized allocation and the majority of study participants were self-selected volunteers. Written examinations and observed clinical evaluations were common study outcome assessments. Eleven studies provided student-teachers with formal teacher training. Overall, results suggest that peer-teaching, in highly selective contexts, achieves short-term learner outcomes that are comparable with those produced by faculty-based teaching. Furthermore, peer-teaching has beneficial effects on student-teacher learning outcomes.
Conclusions: Peer-teaching in undergraduate medical programs is comparable to conventional teaching when utilized in selected contexts. There is evidence to suggest that participating student-teachers benefit academically and professionally. Long-term effects of peer-teaching during medical school remain poorly understood and future research should aim to address this.
Keywords: medical school; medical student; near-peer teaching; peer-assisted learning; peer-teaching.
Similar articles
-
Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review.Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Jul 11;14:723-739. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S401766. eCollection 2023. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023. PMID: 37455859 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447007
-
Peer teachers as ultrasound instructors? - a systematic literature review of peer teaching concepts in undergraduate ultrasound education.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):1369. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06345-7. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39593017 Free PMC article.
-
Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs.BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1356-2. BMC Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 30442139 Free PMC article.
-
Near-peer teaching in undergraduate nurse education: An integrative review.Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Nov;70:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 17. Nurse Educ Today. 2018. PMID: 30145536 Review.
Cited by
-
ComPACT (Competency-Based Peer-Assisted Coaching and Tutoring): A Proposed Curricular Framework for Near-Peer Tutoring in Medical Education.Med Sci Educ. 2024 May 24;34(5):1133-1159. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02070-4. eCollection 2024 Oct. Med Sci Educ. 2024. PMID: 39450010
-
Voluntary peer-led exam preparation course for international first year students: Tutees' perceptions.BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jun 18;15:106. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0391-5. BMC Med Educ. 2015. PMID: 26084490 Free PMC article.
-
A Student-Led Clinical Informatics Enrichment Course for Medical Students.Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):322-326. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743244. Epub 2022 Mar 2. Appl Clin Inform. 2022. PMID: 35235995 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Peer-assisted learning (PAL): skills lab tutors' experiences and motivation.BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 14;19(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1760-2. BMC Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 31521146 Free PMC article.
-
Peer assisted feedback: a successful approach for providing feedback on United States Medical Licensing Exam-style clinical skills exam notes in the United States.J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:29. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.29. Epub 2019 Oct 8. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019. PMID: 31614406 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cornwall MG. Students as teachers: Peer teaching in higher education. Amsterdam: Centrum Onderzoek Wetenschappelijk Onderwijs; 1980.
-
- Schmidt HG, Moust JH. What makes a tutor effective? A structural-equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Acad Med. 1995;70(8):708–714. - PubMed
-
- Ten Cate O, Durning S. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):546–552. - PubMed
-
- Bruffee KA. Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999.
-
- Secomb J. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(6):703–716. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical