Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification
- PMID: 23746611
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.034
Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a method for automatizing the detection of subclinical keratoconus based on a tree classification.
Design: Retrospective case-control study.
Methods: setting: University Hospital of Bordeaux. participants: A total of 372 eyes of 197 patients were enrolled: 177 normal eyes of 95 subjects, 47 eyes of 47 patients with forme fruste keratoconus, and 148 eyes of 102 patients with keratoconus. observation procedure: All eyes were imaged with a dual Scheimpflug analyzer. Fifty-five parameters derived from anterior and posterior corneal measurements were analyzed for each eye and a machine learning algorithm, the classification and regression tree, was used to classify the eyes into the 3 above-mentioned conditions. main outcome measures: The performance of the machine learning algorithm for classifying eye conditions was evaluated, and the curvature, elevation, pachymetric, and wavefront parameters were analyzed in each group and compared.
Results: The discriminating rules generated with the automated decision tree classifier allowed for discrimination between normal and keratoconus with 100% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity, and between normal and forme fruste keratoconus with 93.6% sensitivity and 97.2% specificity. The algorithm selected as the most discriminant variables parameters related to posterior surface asymmetry and thickness spatial distribution.
Conclusion: The machine learning classifier showed very good performance for discriminating between normal corneas and forme fruste keratoconus and provided a tool that is closer to an automated medical reasoning. This might help in the surgical decision before refractive surgery by providing a good sensitivity in detecting ectasia-susceptible corneas.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.Ophthalmology. 2012 Nov;119(11):2231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.005. Epub 2012 Aug 11. Ophthalmology. 2012. PMID: 22892148
-
Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;39(9):1348-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 Jun 29. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013. PMID: 23820305
-
Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.J Refract Surg. 2013 Apr;29(4):274-81. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130318-07. J Refract Surg. 2013. PMID: 23557226
-
A Systematic Review of Subclinical Keratoconus and Forme Fruste Keratoconus.J Refract Surg. 2020 Apr 1;36(4):270-279. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200212-03. J Refract Surg. 2020. PMID: 32267959
-
A Review of Machine Learning Techniques for Keratoconus Detection and Refractive Surgery Screening.Semin Ophthalmol. 2019;34(4):317-326. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2019.1620812. Epub 2019 Jun 9. Semin Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31304857 Review.
Cited by
-
Pix2pix Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks for Scheimpflug Camera Color-Coded Corneal Tomography Image Generation.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Jun 1;10(7):21. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.7.21. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021. PMID: 34132759 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive Ability of Galilei to Distinguish Subclinical Keratoconus and Keratoconus from Normal Corneas.J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;11(1):8-16. doi: 10.4103/2008-322X.180707. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016. PMID: 27195079 Free PMC article.
-
Potential applications of artificial intelligence in image analysis in cornea diseases: a review.Eye Vis (Lond). 2024 Mar 7;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40662-024-00376-3. Eye Vis (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38448961 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Simplifying and understanding various topographic indices for keratoconus using Scheimpflug based topographers.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2732-2743. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2111_20. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 33229649 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in machine learning for keratoconus diagnosis.Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 30;45(1):128. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03496-4. Int Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40159519 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical