Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Sep;36(1):25-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 6.

Development and pilot testing of a video-assisted informed consent process

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Development and pilot testing of a video-assisted informed consent process

Susan C Sonne et al. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

The informed consent process for research has come under scrutiny, as consent documents are increasingly long and difficult to understand. Innovations are needed to improve comprehension in order to make the consent process truly informed. We report on the development and pilot testing of video clips that could be used during the consent process to better explain research procedures to potential participants. Based on input from researchers and community partners, 15 videos of common research procedures/concepts were produced. The utility of the videos was then tested by embedding them in mock-informed consent documents that were presented via an online electronic consent system designed for delivery via iPad. Three mock consents were developed, each containing five videos. All participants (n = 61) read both a paper version and the video-assisted iPad version of the same mock consent and were randomized to which format they reviewed first. Participants were given a competency quiz that posed specific questions about the information in the consent after reviewing the first consent document to which they were exposed. Most participants (78.7%) preferred the video-assisted format compared to paper (12.9%). Nearly all (96.7%) reported that the videos improved their understanding of the procedures described in the consent document; however, the comprehension of material did not significantly differ by consent format. Results suggest videos may be helpful in providing participants with information about study procedures in a way that is easy to understand. Additional testing of video consents for complex protocols and with subjects of lower literacy is warranted.

Keywords: Electronic forms; Informed consent process; Tablet computing; Videos.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of video assisted consent format
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ratings of helpfulness of videos
Figure 3
Figure 3
Helpfulness of Procedural Videos Compared to Conceptual Videos

References

    1. Fortun P, West J, Chalkley L, Shonde A, Hawkey C. Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials. QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians. 2008;101:625–9. - PubMed
    1. Muir KW, Lee PP. Literacy and informed consent: a case for literacy screening in glaucoma research. Archives of ophthalmology. 2009;127:698–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agoritsas T, Perneger TV. Patient-reported conformity of informed consent procedures and participation in clinical research. QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians. 2011;104:151–9. - PubMed
    1. Dunn LB, Lindamer LA, Palmer BW, Schneiderman LJ, Jeste DV. Enhancing comprehension of consent for research in older patients with psychosis: a randomized study of a novel consent procedure. The American journal of psychiatry. 2001;158:1911–3. - PubMed
    1. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Moscucci M, Brennan-Martinez CM, Levine R. Patient comprehension of an interactive, computer-based information program for cardiac catheterization: a comparison with standard information. Archives of internal medicine. 2009;169:1907–14. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources