Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 15:5:33-42.
doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S42044. Print 2013.

Posterior composite restoration update: focus on factors influencing form and function

Brenda S Bohaty  1 , Qiang Ye, Anil Misra, Fabio Sene, Paulette Spencer
Affiliations

Posterior composite restoration update: focus on factors influencing form and function

Brenda S Bohaty et al. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. .

Abstract

Restoring posterior teeth with resin-based composite materials continues to gain popularity among clinicians, and the demand for such aesthetic restorations is increasing. Indeed, the most common aesthetic alternative to dental amalgam is resin composite. Moderate to large posterior composite restorations, however, have higher failure rates, more recurrent caries, and increased frequency of replacement. Investigators across the globe are researching new materials and techniques that will improve the clinical performance, handling characteristics, and mechanical and physical properties of composite resin restorative materials. Despite such attention, large to moderate posterior composite restorations continue to have a clinical lifetime that is approximately one-half that of the dental amalgam. While there are numerous recommendations regarding preparation design, restoration placement, and polymerization technique, current research indicates that restoration longevity depends on several variables that may be difficult for the dentist to control. These variables include the patient's caries risk, tooth position, patient habits, number of restored surfaces, the quality of the tooth-restoration bond, and the ability of the restorative material to produce a sealed tooth-restoration interface. Although clinicians tend to focus on tooth form when evaluating the success and failure of posterior composite restorations, the emphasis must remain on advancing our understanding of the clinical variables that impact the formation of a durable seal at the restoration-tooth interface. This paper presents an update of existing technology and underscores the mechanisms that negatively impact the durability of posterior composite restorations in permanent teeth.

Keywords: bonding; composites; dental restorations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proximal carious lesion with direct access.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Tooth preparation with direct proximal access.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Traditional class II tooth preparation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pre-operative class II amalgam restoration.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Post-operative class II resin restoration.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Incremental filling technique representation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beazoglou T, Eklund S, Heffley D, Meiers J, Brown LJ, Bailit H. Economic impact of regulating the use of amalgam restorations. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(5):657–663. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray PE, Windsor LJ, Smyth TW, Hafez AA, Cox CF. Analysis of pulpal reactions to restorative procedures, materials, pulp capping, and future therapies. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002;13(6):509–520. - PubMed
    1. Palmer C. Good progress reported in mercury treaty talks. ADA News. 2011;42(21):1–2.
    1. Simecek JW, Diefenderfer KE, Cohen ME. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in US. Navy and marine corps recruits. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(2):200–209. - PubMed
    1. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):775–783. - PubMed