Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;75(1):1-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

Effects of screening for psychological distress on patient outcomes in cancer: a systematic review

Anna Meijer  1 , Michelle Roseman, Vanessa C Delisle, Katherine Milette, Brooke Levis, Achyuth Syamchandra, Michael E Stefanek, Donna E Stewart, Peter de Jonge, James C Coyne, Brett D Thombs
Affiliations

Effects of screening for psychological distress on patient outcomes in cancer: a systematic review

Anna Meijer et al. J Psychosom Res. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Several practice guidelines recommend routine screening for psychological distress in cancer care. The objective was to evaluate the effect of screening cancer patients for psychological distress by assessing the (1) effectiveness of interventions to reduce distress among patients identified as distressed; and (2) effects of screening for distress on distress outcomes.

Methods: CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, ISI, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS databases were searched through April 6, 2011 with manual searches of 45 relevant journals, reference list review, citation tracking of included articles, and trial registry reviews through June 30, 2012. Articles in any language on cancer patients were included if they (1) compared treatment for patients with psychological distress to placebo or usual care in a randomized controlled trial (RCT); or (2) assessed the effect of screening on psychological distress in a RCT.

Results: There were 14 eligible RCTs for treatment of distress, and 1 RCT on the effects of screening on patient distress. Pharmacological, psychotherapy and collaborative care interventions generally reduced distress with small to moderate effects. One study investigated effects of screening for distress on psychological outcomes, and it found no improvement.

Conclusion: Treatment studies reported modest improvement in distress symptoms, but only a single eligible study was found on the effects of screening cancer patients for distress, and distress did not improve in screened patients versus those receiving usual care. Because of the lack of evidence of beneficial effects of screening cancer patients for distress, it is premature to recommend or mandate implementation of routine screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Flow Diagram of Study Selection Process for Review Question #1
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA Flow Diagram of Study Selection Process for Review Question #2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Holland JC, Bultz BD National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) The NCCN guideline for distress management: a case for making distress the sixth vital sign. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007;5:3–7. - PubMed
    1. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001;10:19–28. - PubMed
    1. Bultz BD, Holland JC. Emotional distress in patients with cancer: the sixth vital sign. Community Oncology. 2006;3:311–314.
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guideline on cancer services: Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. NICE; 2004.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. NCCN; 2008. Distress management.

Publication types

MeSH terms