Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jun 18;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):10416-23.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301194110. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates

Sarah F Brosnan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

A distinctive feature across human societies is our interest in justice and fairness. People will sometimes invest in extremely costly behavior to achieve fair outcomes for themselves and others. Why do people care so much about justice? One way to address this is comparatively, exploring behaviors related to justice and fairness in other species. In this paper, I review work exploring responses to inequity, prosocial behavior, and other relevant behaviors in nonhuman primates in an effort to understand both the potential evolutionary function of these behaviors and the social and ecological reasons for the individual differences in behavior. I also consider how these behaviors relate to human behavior, particularly in the case of experimental studies using games derived from experimental economics to compare nonhuman primates' responses to those of humans in similar experimental conditions. These results emphasize the importance of a comparative approach to better understand the function and diversity of human behavior.

Keywords: behavioral phylogeny; comparative economics; cooperation; decision-making; game theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic diagram of the UG.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Schematic of the IG. The full IG has not yet been explored with other species; however, a typical inequity procedure is reminiscent of the responder’s choice in the IG (indicated by the dotted line).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Schematic diagram indicating the responses to inequity of species that have been tested using the typical inequity procedure in which subjects exchange tokens for rewards while sitting next to a partner. The photos representing species that show a negative response to inequity in this task are outlined in green, and those that do not are outlined in red. The names of species that show extensive social cooperation, such as coalitions and alliances, are in green, those that do not are in red, and interdependent species (e.g., with biparental care) are in violet. Humans show both extensive social cooperation and biparental care. Note that this diagram excludes gorillas, for whom too little information is known. The photographs of the macaque and bonobo are by F. B. M. de Waal. The photograph of the orangutan is by C. Talbot. The photograph of Darwin is from the public domain. All other photographs are by the author.

References

    1. Eisenberg N, Mussen PH. 1989. The Roots of Prosocial Behavior in Children (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK; New York)
    1. Henrich J, Fehr E, Bowles S, Boyd R, Camerer C. 2004. Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford)
    1. Wilson BJ. Contra Private Fairness. Am J Econ Sociol. 2012;71(2):407–435.
    1. Frank RH. 1988. Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions (W. W. Norton, New York)
    1. de Waal FBM. The chimpanzee's sense of social regularity and its relation to the human sense of justice. Am Behav Sci. 1991;34(3):335–349.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources