Stimulant medication and substance use outcomes: a meta-analysis
- PMID: 23754458
- PMCID: PMC6688478
- DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1273
Stimulant medication and substance use outcomes: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Importance: Psychostimulant medication is an efficacious treatment for childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, yet controversy remains regarding potential iatrogenic effects of stimulant medication, particularly with respect to increasing susceptibility to later substance use disorders. However, stimulant treatment was previously reported to reduce the risk of substance problems.
Objective: To meta-analyze the longitudinal association between treatment with stimulant medication during childhood and later substance outcomes (ie, lifetime substance use and substance abuse or dependence).
Data sources: Studies published between January 1980 and February 2012 were identified using review articles, PubMed, and pertinent listservs.
Study selection: Studies with longitudinal designs in which medication treatment preceded the measurement of substance outcomes.
Data extraction and synthesis: Odds ratios were extracted or provided by the study authors. Odds ratios were obtained for lifetime use (ever used) and abuse or dependence status for alcohol, cocaine, marijuana, nicotine, and nonspecific drugs for 2565 participants from 15 different studies.
Main outcomes and measures: Random-effects models estimated the overall association, and potential study moderators were examined.
Results: Separate random-effects analyses were conducted for each substance outcome, with the number of studies ranging from 3 to 11 for each outcome. Results suggested comparable outcomes between children with and without medication treatment history for any substance use and abuse or dependence outcome across all substance types.
Conclusions: These results provide an important update and suggest that treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with stimulant medication neither protects nor increases the risk of later substance use disorders.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Figures
Comment in
-
Review: no evidence that stimulant medication for ADHD influences lifetime risk of substance use or dependence.Evid Based Ment Health. 2014 Feb;17(1):16. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101514. Epub 2013 Oct 8. Evid Based Ment Health. 2014. PMID: 24104557 No abstract available.
-
Stimulant medication for ADHD not associated with subsequent substance use disorders.Evid Based Med. 2014 Apr;19(2):78. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101519. Epub 2013 Nov 26. Evid Based Med. 2014. PMID: 24282168 No abstract available.
References
-
- Greenhill LL, Pliszka S, Dulcan MK, et al. ; American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Practice parameter for the use of stimulant medications in the treatment of children, adolescents, and adults. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41(2)(suppl):26S–49S. - PubMed
-
- O’Brien JM, Felt BT, Van Harrison R, Kochhar PK, Riolo SA. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Guidelines for Clinical Care. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Health System; 2005.
-
- Kollins SH. Comparing the abuse potential of methylphenidate versus other stimulants: a review of available evidence and relevance to the ADHD patient. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64(suppl 11):14–18. - PubMed
-
- Kollins SH. A qualitative review of issues arising in the use of psycho-stimulant medications in patients with ADHD and co-morbid substance use disorders. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24(5):1345–1357. - PubMed
-
- Kollins SH, MacDonald EK, Rush CR. Assessing the abuse potential of methylphenidate in nonhuman and human subjects: a review. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001;68(3):611–627. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
