Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov;22(11):2481-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2849-7. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety

Affiliations

Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: preoperative image considerations for safety

Il Choi et al. Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and radiological risk factors for exiting root injuries during transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.

Methods: We retrospectively examined cohort data from 233 patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2011. We divided the patients into the two groups: those who presented a postoperative exiting root injury, such as postoperative dysesthesia or motor weakness (Group A, n = 20), and those who did not suffer from a root injury (Group B, n = 213). We examined the clinical and radiological factors relating exiting root injuries. We measured the active working zone with the exiting root to the upper facet distance (Distance A), the exiting root to disc surface distance at the lower facet line (Distance B) and the exiting root to the lower facet distance (Distance C) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results: Group A exhibited a shorter Distance C (6.4 ± 1.5 versus 4.4 ± 0.8 mm, p < 0.001) and a longer operation time (67.9 ± 21.8 versus 80.3 ± 23.7 min, p = 0.017) relative to Group B. The complication rate decreased by 23% per each 1-mm increase in Distance C (p = 0.000). In addition, the complication rate increased 1.027-fold per each 1-min increase in the operation time (p = 0.027).

Conclusion: We recommend measuring the distance from the exiting root to the facet at the lower disc level according to a preoperative MRI scan. If the distance is narrow, an alternative surgical method, such as microdiscectomy or conventional open discectomy, should be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A schematic illustration of structures in the photograph showing working zone; a the exiting root to the upper facet distance (Distance A): the shortest distance between the root and facet surface at the upper disc margin level, b the exiting root to disc surface distance at the lower facet line (Distance B): the shortest distance between the root and disc surface at the lower disc margin level and c the exiting root to the lower facet distance (Distance C): the shortest distance between the root and facet surface at lower disc margin level
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The MRI showing working zone at the L4–5 disc level a the exiting root to the upper facet distance (Distance A): the shortest distance between the root and facet surface at the upper disc margin level, b the exiting root to disc surface distance at the lower facet line (Distance B): the shortest distance between the root and disc surface at the lower disc margin level and c the exiting root to the lower facet distance (Distance C): the shortest distance between the root and facet surface at lower disc margin level
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The distribution of mean (±SE) Distance C according to the exiting nerve injury. Group A had exiting root injury. Group B was free from exiting root injury. Distance C the shortest distance between the root and facet surface at the lower disc margin level

References

    1. Kambin P, Gellman H. Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine—a preliminary-report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;174:127–132.
    1. Forst R, Hausmann B. Nucleoscopy—a new examination technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1983;101:219–221. doi: 10.1007/BF00436774. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Onik G, Helms C, Ginsburg L, et al. Percutaneous lumbar diskectomy using a new aspiration probe. Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144:1137–1140. doi: 10.2214/ajr.144.6.1137. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kambin P, Nixon JE, Chait A, et al. Annular protrusion: pathophysiology and roentgenographic appearance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988;13:671–675. - PubMed
    1. Mayer HM, Brock M. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) Neurosurg Rev. 1993;16:115–120. doi: 10.1007/BF00258242. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources