Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;22(2):266-9.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.119. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

Clarifying assent in pediatric research

Affiliations

Clarifying assent in pediatric research

Noor A A Giesbertz et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Assent is a relatively young term in research ethics, but became an often mentioned ethical requirement in current pediatric research guidelines. Also, the European Society of Human Genetics considers assent an important condition for the inclusion of children in biobanks. However, although many emphasize the importance of assent, few explain how they understand the concept and few have elaborated on the underlying grounds. In this paper, we will discuss the different underlying ethical principles of assent. In the first category, assent appears to be derived from informed consent. This understanding is grounded in respect for autonomy and protection against harm. We conclude that this interpretation of assent is not of added value as a majority of children cannot be considered competent to make autonomous decisions. In addition, other safeguards are more appropriate to protect children against harm. The grounds from the second category can be classified as engagement grounds. These grounds do justice to the specifics of childhood and are of added value. Furthermore, we argue that it follows that both the content and the process of assent should be adjusted to the individual child. This can be referred to as personalized assent. Personalized assent is an appeal to the moral responsibility and integrity of the researcher.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Salvaterra E, Giorda R, Bassi MT, et al. Pediatric biobanking: a pilot qualitative survey of practices, rules, and researcher opinions in ten European countries. Biopreserv Biobank. 2012;10:29–36. - PubMed
    1. Gilheeney SW, Kieran MW. Differences in molecular genetics between pediatric and adult malignant astrocytomas: age matters. Future Oncol. 2012;8:549–558. - PubMed
    1. Merlo DF, Knudsen LE, Matusiewicz K, Niebroj L, Vahakangas KH. Ethics in studies on children and environmental health. J Med Ethics. 2007;33:408–413. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pedersen M, Merlo DF, Knudsen LE. Ethical issues related to biomonitoring studies on children. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007;210:479–482. - PubMed
    1. Van Larebeke NA, Birnbaum LS, Boogaerts MA, et al. Unrecognized or potential risk factors for childhood cancer. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2005;11:199–201. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources