Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Jun 11;2013(6):CD002116.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002116.pub2.

Drug treatment for faecal incontinence in adults

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Drug treatment for faecal incontinence in adults

Muhammad Imran Omar et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Faecal incontinence (leakage of bowel motions or stool) is a common symptom which causes significant distress and reduces quality of life.

Objectives: To assess the effects of drug therapy for the treatment of faecal incontinence. In particular, to assess the effects of individual drugs relative to placebo or other drugs, and to compare drug therapy with other treatment modalities.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register of Trials, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and MEDLINE in process, and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings (searched 21 June 2012) and the reference lists of relevant articles.

Selection criteria: All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials were included in this systematic review.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently screened abstracts, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of the included trials.

Main results: Sixteen trials were identified, including 558 participants. Eleven trials were of cross-over design. Eleven trials included only people with faecal incontinence related to liquid stool (either chronic diarrhoea, following ileoanal pouch or rectal surgery, or due to use of a weight-reducing drug). Two trials were amongst people with weak anal sphincters, one in participants with faecal impaction and bypass leakage, and one in geriatric patients. In one trial there was no specific cause for faecal incontinence.Seven trials tested anti-diarrhoeal drugs to reduce faecal incontinence and other bowel symptoms (loperamide, diphenoxylate plus atropine, and codeine). Six trials tested drugs that enhance anal sphincter function (phenylepinephrine gel and sodium valproate). Two trials evaluated osmotic laxatives (lactulose) for the treatment of faecal incontinence associated with constipation in geriatric patients. One trial assessed the use of zinc-aluminium ointment for faecal incontinence. No studies comparing drugs with other treatment modalities were identified.There was limited evidence that antidiarrhoeal drugs and drugs that enhance anal sphincter tone may reduce faecal incontinence in patients with liquid stools. Loperamide was associated with more adverse effects (such as constipation, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, headache and nausea) than placebo. However, the dose may be titrated to the patient's symptoms to minimise side effects while achieving continence. The drugs acting on the sphincter sometimes resulted in local dermatitis, abdominal pain or nausea. Laxative use in geriatric patients reduced faecal soiling and the need for help from nurses.Zinc-aluminium ointment was associated with improved quality of life, with no reported adverse effects. However, the observed improvement in quality of life was seen in the placebo group as well as the treatment group.It should be noted that all the included trials in this review had small sample sizes and short duration of follow-up. 'Risk of bias' assessment was unclear for most of the domains as there was insufficient information. There were no data suitable for meta-analysis.

Authors' conclusions: The small number of trials identified for this review assessed several different drugs in a variety of patient populations. The focus of most of the included trials was on the treatment of diarrhoea, rather than faecal incontinence. There is little evidence to guide clinicians in the selection of drug therapies for faecal incontinence. Larger, well-designed controlled trials, which use the recommendations and principles set out in the CONSORT statement, and include clinically important outcome measures, are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1
1
PRISMA study flow diagram.
2
2
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Carapeti 2000a # {published and unpublished data}
    1. Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS. Randomized controlled trial of topical phenylephrine in the treatment of faecal incontinence. British Journal of Surgery 2000;87(1):38‐42. - PubMed
Carapeti 2000b # {published and unpublished data}
    1. Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Phillips RKS. Randomized, controlled trial of topical phenylephrine for fecal incontinence in patients after ileoanal pouch construction. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2000;43(8):1059‐63. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Chassagne 2000 {published data only}
    1. Chassagne P, Jego A, Gloc P, Capet C, Trivalle C, Doucet J, et al. Does treatment of constipation improve faecal incontinence in institutionalized elderly patients?. Age and Ageing 2000;29:159‐64. - PubMed
Cheetham 2001 # {published data only}
    1. Cheetham MJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS. Topical phenylephrine increases anal canal resting pressure in patients with faecal incontinence. Gut 2001;48:356‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Cohen 2001 # {published data only}
    1. Cohen LD, Levitt MD. A comparison of the effect of loperamide in oral or suppository form vs placebo in patients with ileo‐anal pouches. Colorectal Disease 2001;3(2):95‐9. - PubMed
Fox 2005 # {published data only}
    1. Fox M, Stutz B, Menne D, Fried M, Schwizer W, Thumshirn M. The effects of loperamide on continence problems and anorectal function in obese subjects taking orlistat. Digestive Diseases & Sciences 2005;50(9):1576‐83. - PubMed
Hallgren 1994 # {published data only}
    1. Hallgren T, Fasth S, Delbro DS, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hulten L. Loperamide improves anal sphincter function and continence after restorative proctocoloectomy. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1994;39(12):2612‐18. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Harford 1980 # {published data only}
    1. Harford WV, Krejs GJ, Santa Ana CA, Fordtran JS. Acute effect of diphenoxylate with atropine (Lomotil) in patients with chronic diarrhoea and faecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 1980;78(3):440‐3. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Kusunoki 1990 # {published data only}
    1. Kusunoki M, Shoji Y, Ikeuchi H, Yamagata K, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J. Usefulness of valproate sodium for the treatment of incontinence after ileoanal anastomosis. Surgery 1990;107(3):311‐5. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Lumi 2009 {published data only}
    1. Lumi CM, Rosa L, Coraglio MF, Munoz JP, Gualdrini UA, Masciangioli G. [Prospective, double‐blind study of topical phenylephrine treatment for nocturnal fecal incontinence in patients after ileoanal pouch construction]. [Spanish]. Acta Gastroenterologica Latinoamericana 2009;39(3):179‐83. - PubMed
Palmer 1980 # {published data only}
    1. Corbett CL, Palmer KR, Holdsworth CD. Effect of loperamide, codeine phosphate and diphenoxylate on urgency and incontinence in chronic diarrhoea (abstract). Gut 1980;21(Suppl 1‐12):A924.
    1. Palmer KR, Corbett CL, Holdsworth CD. Double‐blind cross‐over study comparing loperamide, codeine and diphenoxylate in the treatment of chronic diarrhoea. Gastroenterology 1980;79(6):1272‐5. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Park 2007 {published data only}
    1. Park JS, Kang SB, Kim DW, Namgung HW, Kim HL. The efficacy and adverse effects of topical phenylephrine for anal incontinence after low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2007;22(11):1319‐24. - PubMed
Pinedo 2012 {published data only}
    1. Pinedo G, Zarate AJ, Inostroza G, Meneses X, Falloux E, Molina O, et al. New treatment for faecal incontinence using zinc‐aluminium ointment: a double‐blind randomized trial. Colorectal Disease 2012;14(5):596‐8. - PubMed
Read 1982 # {published data only}
    1. Read M, Read NW, Barber DC, Duthie HL. Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhoea with faecal incontinence and urgency. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1982;27(9):807‐14. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Ryan 1974 {published data only}
    1. Ryan D, Wilson A, Muir TS, Judge TG. The reduction of faecal incontinence by the use of 'Duphalac' in geriatric patients. Current Medical Research and Opinion 1974;2(6):329‐33. - PubMed
    1. Wilson A, Ryan D, Muir TS. Geriatric faecal incontinence. A drug trial conducted by nurses. Nursing Mirror & Midwives Journal 1975;140(16):50‐2. - PubMed
Sun 1997 # {published data only}
    1. Sun WM, Read NW, Verlinden M. Effects of loperamide oxide on gastrointestinal transit time and anorectal function in patients with chronic diarrhoea and faecal incontinence. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 1997;32(1):34‐8. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Bliss 2001 {published data only}
    1. Bliss DZ, Jung HJ, Savik K, Lowry A, LeMoine M, Jensen L, et al. Supplementation with dietary fiber improves fecal incontinence. Nursing Research 2001;50(4):203‐13. - PubMed
Christensen 2006 {published data only}
    1. Christensen P, Bazzocchi G, Coggrave M, Abel R, Hultling C, Krogh K, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of transanal irrigation versus conservative bowel management in spinal cord‐injured patients. Gastroenterology 2006;131(3):738‐47. - PubMed
    1. Christensen P, Bazzocchi G, Coggrave M, Abel R, Hultling C, Krogh K, et al. Treatment of faecal incontinence and constipation in patients with spinal cord injury ‐ a prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre trial of transanal irrigation vs conservative bowel management (Abstract). Neurourology and Urodynamics 2007;25(6):594‐5.
Drossman 2007 {published data only}
    1. Drossman D, Morris CB, Hu Y, Toner BB, Diamant N, Whitehead WE, et al. Characterization of health related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients with functional bowel disorder (FBD) and its response to treatment. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2007;102(7):1442‐53. - PubMed
Emblem 1989 {published data only}
    1. Emblem R, Stien R, Morkrid L. The effect of loperamide on bowel habits and anal sphincter function in patients with ileoanal anastomosis. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 1989;24(8):1019‐24. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Eogan 2007 {published data only}
    1. Eogan M, Daly L, Behan M, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Randomised clinical trial of a laxative alone versus a laxative and a bulking agent after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury. BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2007;114(6):736‐40. - PubMed
Freedman 1959 {published data only}
    1. Freedman N, Warshaw L, Engelhardt DM, Blumenthal IJ, Hankoff LD. The effect of various therapies upon fecal incontinence in chronic schizophrenic patients. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease 1959;128(Jun):562‐5. - PubMed
Grijalva 2010 {published data only}
    1. Grijalva I, Garcia‐Perez A, Diaz J, Aguilar S, Mino D, Santiago‐Rodriguez E, et al. High doses of 4‐aminopyridine improve functionality in chronic complete spinal cord injury patients with MRI evidence of cord continuity. Archives of Medical Research 2010;41(7):567‐75. - PubMed
Harari 2004 {published data only}
    1. Harari D, Norton C, Lockwood L, Swift C. Treatment of constipation and fecal incontinence in stroke patients: randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2004;35(11):2549‐55. - PubMed
Henriksson 1992 {published data only}
    1. Henriksson R, Franzen L, Littbrand B. Effects of sucralfate on acute and late bowel discomfort following radiotherapy of pelvic cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1992;10(6):969‐75. - PubMed
Heymen 2004 {published data only}
    1. Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Education and medical management resolve fecal incontinence in 35%, but depression and greater symptom severity predict a poor response (Abstract). Gastroenterology 2004;126(4 (Suppl 2)):A480.
Heymen 2004a {published data only}
    1. Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Whitehead WE. Anorectal physiology predicts response to conservative medical management of fecal incontinence (Abstract). Gastroenterology 2004;126(4 (Suppl 2)):A363. - PubMed
Lauti 2008 {published data only}
    1. Lauti M, Scott D, Thompson‐Fawcett MW. Fibre supplementation in addition to loperamide for faecal incontinence in adults: a randomized trial. Colorectal Disease 2008;10(6):553‐62. - PubMed
Qvitzau 1988 {published data only}
    1. Qvitzau S, Matzen P, Madsen P. Treatment of chronic diarrhoea: loperamide versus ispaghula husk and calcium. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 1988;23(10):1237‐40. - PubMed
Rosman 2008 {published data only}
    1. Rosman AS, Chaparala G, Monga A, Spungen AM, Bauman WA, Korsten MA. Intramuscular neostigmine and glycopyrrolate safely accelerated bowel evacuation in patients with spinal cord injury and defecatory disorders. Digestive Diseases & Sciences 2008;53(10):2710‐3. - PubMed
Santos 1961 {published data only}
    1. Santos L, Gross M. The clinical effect of norethandrolone on incontinent mental patients action induced by non‐verbal communication. Clinical Notes 1962:223‐6. - PubMed
    1. Santos L, Gross M. The clinical effect of norethandrolone on incontinent mental patients. Action induced by non‐verbal communication. American Journal of Psychiatry 1961;118:223‐6. - PubMed
Schneiter 1972 {published data only}
    1. Schneiter R. [Favorable surgical‐clinical experiences with a new laxative acting on the large intestine]. [German]. Schweizerische Rundschau fur Medizin Praxis 1972;61(42):1311‐2. - PubMed
Shoji 1993 {published data only}
    1. Shoji Y, Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Sakanoue Y, Utsunomiya J. Effects of sodium valproate on various intestinal motor functions after ileal J pouch‐anal anastomosis. Surgery 1993;113(5):560‐3. - PubMed
Tu 2008 {published data only}
    1. Tu XH, Chen ZY. [Clinical efficacy of buzhong yiqi pill combined with imodium in treating post‐operational diarrhea in patients of colonic cancer] [Chinese]. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi Zhongguo Zhongxiyi Jiehe Zazhi/Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional & Western Medicine/Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Hui, Zhongguo Zhong Yi Yan Jiu Yuan Zhu Ban 2008;28(8):738‐41. - PubMed
Van Assche 2012 {published data only}
    1. Assche G, Ferrante M, Vermeire S, Noman M, Rans K, Biest L, et al. Octreotide for the treatment of diarrhoea in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a placebo‐controlled crossover study. Colorectal Disease 2012;14(4):e181‐6. - PubMed
Whitebird 2006 {published data only}
    1. Whitebird RR, Bliss DZ, Hase KA, Savik K. Community‐based recruitment and enrolment for a clinical trial on the sensitive issue of fecal incontinence: the Fiber study. Research in Nursing & Health 2006;29(3):233‐43. - PubMed

Additional references

Brown 2010
    1. Brown SR, Nelson RL. Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001757.pub3] - DOI - PubMed
Da Silva 2003
    1. Silva GM, Berho M, Wexner SD, Efron J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, et al. Histologic analysis of the irradiated anal sphincter. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2003;46(11):1492‐7. - PubMed
Deutekom 2012
    1. Deutekom M, Dobben AC. Plugs for containing faecal incontinence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005086.pub3] - DOI - PubMed
Fader 2009
    1. Fader M, Cottenden AM, Getliffe K. Absorbent products for moderate‐heavy urinary and/or faecal incontinence in women and men. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007408] - DOI - PubMed
Gattuso 1994
    1. Gattuso JM, Kamm MA. Adverse effects of drugs used in the management of constipation and diarrhoea. Drug Safety 1994;10(1):47‐65. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Herbst 1998
    1. Herbst F, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ. Effects of loperamide on ileoanal pouch function. British Journal of Surgery 1998;85(10):1428‐32. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Lindsey 2004
    1. Lindsey I, Jones OM, Smilgin‐Humphreys MM, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ. Patterns of fecal incontinence after anal surgery. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2004;47(10):1643‐9. - PubMed
Madoff 2009
    1. Madoff RD, Laurberg S, Matzel KE, Mellgren AF, Mimura T, O’Connell PR, et al. Surgery for fecal incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A editor(s). Incontinence: 4th International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth: Health Publications, 2008:1387‐418.
Maeda 2013
    1. Maeda Y, Laurberg S, Norton C. Perianal injectable bulking agents as treatment for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007959.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Mowatt 2007
    1. Mowatt G, Glazener C, Jarrett M. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004464.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
NICE 2007
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, UK. Faecal Incontinence: the management of faecal incontinence in adults. NICE Clinical Guideline Reference Number CG49. http://www.nice.org.uk/CG49. June 2007 (accessed 10 March 2008).
Norton 2012
    1. Norton C, Cody J. Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002111.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Perry 2002
    1. Perry S, Shaw C, McGrother C, Flynn RJ, Assassa RP, Dallosso H, et al. The prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community. Gut 2002;50:480‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Rao 2004
    1. Rao SS. Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2004;126(1):S14–S22.. - PubMed
Rockwood 2000
    1. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, et al. Fecal incontinence quality of life scale. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2000;43:9‐17. - PubMed
Tuteja 2004
    1. Tuteja AK, Rao SS. Review article: recent trends in diagnosis and treatment of faecal incontinence. Alimentary Pharmacol Therapy 2004;19(8):829‐40. - PubMed
Vaizey 1997
    1. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Bartram CI. Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet 1997;349(9052):612‐5. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Ware 1993
    1. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gaudek B. SF‐36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Centre, 1993.
Wheeler 2007
    1. Wheeler TL 2nd, Richter HE. Delivery method, anal sphincter tears and fecal incontinence: new information on a persistent problem. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;19(5):474‐9. - PubMed
Whitehead 2001
    1. Whitehead WE, Wald A, Norton N. Treatment options for fecal incontinence: consensus conference report. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2001;44:131‐44. - PubMed
Whitehead 2009
    1. Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, Meikle S, Mueller ER, Tuteja A, et al. Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors.. Gastroenterology 2009;137(2):512–7. - PMC - PubMed
Zigmond 1983
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983;67(6):361‐70. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Cheetham 2002
    1. Cheetham M, Brazzelli M, Norton C, Glazener CMA. Drug treatment for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002116] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms