Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Oct;36(10):2937-44.
doi: 10.2337/dc13-0315. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

Effect of intensive lifestyle intervention on sexual dysfunction in women with type 2 diabetes: results from an ancillary Look AHEAD study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of intensive lifestyle intervention on sexual dysfunction in women with type 2 diabetes: results from an ancillary Look AHEAD study

Rena R Wing et al. Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Sexual dysfunction is a prevalent problem in obese women with type 2 diabetes. This study examined the effects of intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) in these women.

Research design and methods: Look AHEAD is a 16-center, randomized, controlled trial evaluating the health effects of ILI compared with a control group (diabetes support and education [DSE]). The Look AHEAD Sexual Function Ancillary study included 375 female participants at five Look AHEAD sites. Participants completed the Female Sexual Function Inventory (FSFI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and assessments of weight and cardiovascular risk factors at baseline and 1 year were made.

Results: At baseline, 50% of the 229 participants who reported being sexually active met criteria for female sexual dysfunction (FSD); only BDI score was related to FSD. One-year weight losses were greater in the ILI group than in the DSE group (7.6 vs. 0.45 kg; P<0.001). Among women with FSD at baseline, those in the ILI group (N=60) compared with those in the DSE group (N=53) were significantly more likely to remain sexually active (83 vs. 64%; P<0.008), reported greater improvement in total FSFI scores and in most FSFI domains (P<0.05), and were more likely to experience remission of FSD (28 vs. 11%; P<0.04) at 1 year. No significant differences between ILI and DSE were seen in women who did not have FSD at baseline.

Conclusions: Participation in ILI appeared to have beneficial effects on sexual functioning among obese women with diabetes, particularly in those who had FSD at baseline.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00017953.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percent of women in each category at 1 year. A: Status at 1 year of women who were sexually active and had FSD at baseline in the ILI group (N = 60) and in the DSE group (N = 53). B: Status at 1 year of women who were sexually active and did not have FSD at baseline in the ILI group (N = 56) and in the DSE group (N = 58).
Figure 2
Figure 2
FSFI scores at baseline and 1 year for women in the ILI group (N = 52) and in the DSE group (N = 47) who were sexually active and had FSD at baseline (including women who became sexually inactive at 1 year).

Comment in

References

    1. Shifren JL, Monz BU, Russo PA, Segreti A, Johannes CB. Sexual problems and distress in United States women: prevalence and correlates. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:970–978 - PubMed
    1. Piak A, Laumann EO. Prevalence of women's sexual problems in the USA. In: Goldstein I, Meston C, Traish AM, Eds. Women's Sexual Function and Dysfunction London, Taylor & Francis, 2006, p. 23–33
    1. Bitzer J, Alder J. Diabetes and female sexual health. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2009;5:629–636 - PubMed
    1. Enzlin P, Rosen R, Wiegel M, et al. DCCT/EDIC Research Group Sexual dysfunction in women with type 1 diabetes: long-term findings from the DCCT/EDIC study cohort. Diabetes Care 2009;32:780–785 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esposito K, Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, Giugliano F, Romano M, Giugliano D. Determinants of female sexual dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Int J Impot Res 2010;22:179–184 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

Grants and funding