Screening for prostate cancer: results of the Rotterdam section of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer
- PMID: 23759326
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.030
Screening for prostate cancer: results of the Rotterdam section of the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer
Abstract
Background: Evidence from randomized trials on the effects of screening for prostate cancer (PCa) on disease-specific mortality accumulates slowly with increasing follow-up.
Objective: To assess data on PCa-specific mortality in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial.
Design, setting, and participants: A randomized controlled trial with randomization after signed, written informed consent (efficacy trial). In the period 1993-1999, a total of 42 376 men aged 54-74 yr were randomized to a screening arm (S-arm) (n = 21 210 with screening every 4 yr, applying a total prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level cut-off ≥ 3.0 ng/ml as biopsy indication) or a control arm (C-arm) (n = 21 166; no intervention).
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Number of PCas detected per arm depicted by predefined time periods and prognostic groups. PCa-specific mortality analyses using Poisson regression in age group 55-74 yr at randomization and separately in the predefined age group of 55-69 yr.
Results and limitations: After a median follow-up of 12.8 yr, 19 765 men (94.2%) were screened at least once and 2674 PCas were detected (of which 561 [21.0%] were interval PCas). In the C-arm, 1430 PCas were detected, resulting in an excess incidence of 59 PCas per 1000 men randomized (61 PCas per 1000 in age group 55-69 yr). Thirty-two percent of all men randomized have died. PCa-specific mortality relative-risk (RR) reductions of 20.0% overall (age: 55-74 yr; p = 0.042) and 31.6% (age: 55-69 yr; p = 0.004) were found. A 14.1% increase was found in men aged 70-74 yr (not statistically significant). Absolute PCa mortality was 1.8 per 1000 men randomized (2.6 per 1000 men randomized in age group 55-69 yr). The number needed to invite and number needed to manage were 565 and 33, respectively, for age group 55-74 yr, and 392 and 24, respectively, for age group 65-69 yr. Given the slow natural history of the disease, follow-up might be too short.
Conclusions: Systematic PSA-based screening reduced PCa-specific mortality by 32% in the age range of 55-69 yr. The roughly twofold higher incidence in the S-arm underlines the importance of tools to better identify those men who would benefit from screening.
Keywords: Biopsy; Mortality; PSA; Prostate cancer; Screening.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Screening for prostate cancer: can we learn from the mistakes of the breast screening experience?Eur Urol. 2013 Oct;64(4):540-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.053. Epub 2013 Jun 6. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23768633 No abstract available.
-
Reply from authors re: Michael Baum. Screening for prostate cancer: can we learn from the mistakes of the breast screening experience? Eur Urol 2013;64:540-1: screening for prostate cancer: we have learned and are still learning.Eur Urol. 2013 Oct;64(4):541-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.033. Epub 2013 Jun 26. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23816273 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous