Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 29:6:77-84.
doi: 10.2147/MDER.S44690. Print 2013.

Analysis of postmarket complaints database for the iFuse SI Joint Fusion System®: a minimally invasive treatment for degenerative sacroiliitis and sacroiliac joint disruption

Larry E Miller  1 , W Carlton Reckling, Jon E Block
Affiliations

Analysis of postmarket complaints database for the iFuse SI Joint Fusion System®: a minimally invasive treatment for degenerative sacroiliitis and sacroiliac joint disruption

Larry E Miller et al. Med Devices (Auckl). .

Abstract

Background: The sacroiliac joint is a common but under-recognized source of low back and gluteal pain. Patients with degenerative sacroiliitis or sacroiliac joint disruption resistant to nonsurgical treatments may undergo open surgery with sacroiliac joint arthrodesis, although outcomes are mixed and risks are significant. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint arthrodesis was developed to minimize the risk of iatrogenic injury and to improve patient outcomes compared with open surgery.

Methods: Between April 2009 and January 2013, 5319 patients were treated with the iFuse SI Joint Fusion System® for conditions including sacroiliac joint disruption and degenerative sacroiliitis. A database was prospectively developed to record all complaints reported to the manufacturer in patients treated with the iFuse device. Complaints were collected through spontaneous reporting mechanisms in support of ongoing mandatory postmarket surveillance efforts.

Results: Complaints were reported in 204 (3.8%) patients treated with the iFuse system. Pain was the most commonly reported clinical complaint (n = 119, 2.2%), with nerve impingement (n = 48, 0.9%) and recurrent sacroiliac joint pain (n = 43, 0.8%) most frequently cited. All other clinical complaints were rare (≤0.2%). Ninety-six revision surgeries were performed in 94 (1.8%) patients at a median follow-up of four (range 0-30) months. Revisions were typically performed in the early postoperative period for treatment of a symptomatic malpositioned implant (n = 46, 0.9%) or to correct an improperly sized implant in an asymptomatic patient (n = 10, 0.2%). Revisions in the late postoperative period were performed to treat symptom recurrence (n = 34, 0.6%) or for continued pain of undetermined etiology (n = 6, 0.1%).

Conclusion: Analysis of a postmarket product complaints database demonstrates an overall low risk of complaints with the iFuse SI Joint Fusion System in patients with degenerative sacroiliitis or sacroiliac joint disruption.

Keywords: arthrodesis; iFuse; lumbar; minimally invasive; sacroiliac.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The iFuse SI Joint Fusion System® (SI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) Note: The rigid titanium implants are available in 4 mm and 7 mm diameters with lengths ranging from 30 mm to 70 mm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intraoperative outlet views demonstrating the major sequences of iFuse implantation including initial (A) and final (B) pin placement, bone preparation using a drill (C) and triangular broach (D), first implant placement (E), use of a parallel pin guide for subsequent implants (F), and insertion of second and third iFuse implants (G).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Postoperative radiograph demonstrating three iFuse implants in a female patient who presented with pregnancy-related chronic low back pain and right-sided sacroiliac joint disruption.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time trends in complaints and revisions with the iFuse SI Joint Fusion System® (SI-BONE, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) by index surgery date.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Friedman BW, Chilstrom M, Bijur PE, Gallagher EJ. Diagnostic testing and treatment of low back pain in United States emergency departments: a national perspective. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35(24):E1406–E1411. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson JL, Browning R. Impact of national low back pain guidelines on clinical practice. South Med J. 2005;98(2):139–143. - PubMed
    1. Bernard TN, Jr, Kirkaldy-Willis WH. Recognizing specific characteristics of nonspecific low back pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;217:266–280. - PubMed
    1. Maigne JY, Aivaliklis A, Pfefer F. Results of sacroiliac joint double block and value of sacroiliac pain provocation tests in 54 patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21(16):1889–1892. - PubMed
    1. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N. The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20(1):31–37. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources