Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun 10;8(6):e65050.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065050. Print 2013.

Effective noninvasive zygosity determination by maternal plasma target region sequencing

Affiliations

Effective noninvasive zygosity determination by maternal plasma target region sequencing

Jing Zheng et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Currently very few noninvasive molecular genetic approaches are available to determine zygosity for twin pregnancies in clinical laboratories. This study aimed to develop a novel method to determine zygosity by using maternal plasma target region sequencing.

Methods: We constructed a statistic model to calculate the possibility of each zygosity type using likelihood ratios ( Li ) and empirical dynamic thresholds targeting at 4,524 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) loci on 22 autosomes. Then two dizygotic (DZ) twin pregnancies,two monozygotic (MZ) twin pregnancies and two singletons were recruited to evaluate the performance of our novel method. Finally we estimated the sensitivity and specificity of the model in silico under different cell-free fetal DNA (cff-DNA) concentration and sequence depth.

Results/conclusions: We obtained 8.90 Gbp sequencing data on average for six clinical samples. Two samples were classified as DZ with L values of 1.891 and 1.554, higher than the dynamic DZ cut-off values of 1.162 and 1.172, respectively. Another two samples were judged as MZ with 0.763 and 0.784 of L values, lower than the MZ cut-off values of 0.903 and 0.918. And the rest two singleton samples were regarded as MZ twins, with L values of 0.639 and 0.757, lower than the MZ cut-off values of 0.921 and 0.799. In silico, the estimated sensitivity of our noninvasive zygosity determination was 99.90% under 10% total cff-DNA concentration with 2 Gbp sequence data. As the cff-DNA concentration increased to 15%, the specificity was as high as 97% with 3.50 Gbp sequence data, much higher than 80% with 10% cff-DNA concentration.

Significance: This study presents the feasibility to noninvasively determine zygosity of twin pregnancy using target region sequencing, and illustrates the sensitivity and specificity under various detecting condition. Our method can act as an alternative approach for zygosity determination of twin pregnancies in clinical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Jing Zheng, Jing Guo, Huijuan Ge, Xuchao Li, Chunlei Zhang, Haojun Jiang, Weiping Tang, Weiwei Xie, Hongyun Zhang, Fuman Jiang, Shengpei Chen, Wei Wang, Xun Xu, Fang Chen, Hui Jiang are employees of BGI-Shenzhen and none of the other authors have any financial relationship with BGI-Shenzhen. Also Huijuan Ge, Jing Zheng and Xuchao Li have filed patent applications on the effective noninvasive zygosity determination by maternal plasma target region sequencing. The patent number is PCT/CN2012/075969 and the date is 2012-5-23. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Zygosity determination results of 6 clinical samples.
In Figure 1a, the two points were both above the corresponding DZ cut-off, indicating both samples were correctly determined as DZ. In Figure 1b and 1c, the four points were all under the corresponding MZ cut-off, meaning simulated and real MZ twin pregnancies were all correctly determined.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The estimated sensitivity and specificity.
Figure 2a and 2b indicated the specificity (DZ) and sensitivity (MZ) with different total cff-DNA concentration and sequence depth respectively. The detailed grey level of each square represented the related accuracy according to the legend on the right, ranging from 0% to 100%.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MacDorman MF, Kirmeyer S (2009) Fetal and perinatal mortality, United States, 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 57: 1–19. - PubMed
    1. Simpson LL (2012) Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. - PubMed
    1. (2012) How Often Does TTTS Occur? Avalable: http://tttsfoundationorg/help_during_pregnancy/how_oftenphp. Accessed 2012 Aug 7.
    1. Glinianaia SV, Obeysekera MA, Sturgiss S, Bell R (2011) Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study. Hum Reprod 26: 2549–2557. - PubMed
    1. Stenhouse E, Hardwick C, Maharaj S, Webb J, Kelly T, et al. (2002) Chorionicity determination in twin pregnancies: how accurate are we? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19: 350–352. - PubMed

Publication types