Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Sep;56(9):1914-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-2965-2. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for obese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for obese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised trial

Andrei Keidar et al. Diabetologia. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Bariatric surgery is gaining acceptance as a 'metabolic surgical intervention' for patients with type 2 diabetes. The optimal form of surgery and the mechanism of action of these procedures are much debated. We compared two bariatric procedures for obese patients with type 2 diabetes and evaluated their effects on HbA1c and glucose tolerance.

Methods: We performed a parallel un-blinded randomised trial of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) vs sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in 41 obese patients with type 2 diabetes, who were bariatric surgery candidates attending the obesity clinic. HbA1c, body composition and glucose tolerance were evaluated at baseline, and at 3 and 12 months.

Results: Of the 41 patients, 37 completed the follow-up (19 RYGB, 18 SG). Both groups had similar baseline anthropometric and biochemical measures, and showed comparable weight loss and fat:fat-free mass ratio changes at 12 months. A similar normalisation of HbA1c levels was observed as early as 3 months post-surgery (6.37 ± 0.71% vs 6.23 ± 0.69% for RYGB vs SG respectively, p < 0.001 in both groups for baseline vs follow-up).

Conclusions/interpretation: In this study, RYGB did not have a superior effect in comparison to SG with regard to HbA1c levels or weight loss during 12 months of follow-up.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00667706.

Funding: This work was supported by grant no. 3-000-8480 from the Israel Ministry of Health Chief Scientist, the Stephen Morse Diabetes Research Foundation and by Johnson & Johnson.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Surg. 2011 Feb;146(2):143-8 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Sep;96(9):E1372-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):2227-35 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):1023-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):741-9 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources