Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis
- PMID: 23765557
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25072
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent for treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis
Abstract
Objective: Drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is a very effective treatment of bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis (BMS-ISR). Therapeutic options for drug-eluting stent-in-stent restenosis (DES-ISR) are less well defined, as there are only few data on safety and effectiveness of interventional modalities. This study compared the 1-year clinical outcome after the use of drug-eluting balloon (DEB) to second-generation everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for treatment of DES-ISR.
Methods: This observational study included 86 patients with 86 DES-ISR. Forty patients were treated by repeat percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using an EES. Forty-six patients were treated by repeat PCI using a DEB. Follow-up periods were 22 ± 11 and 25 ± 19 months, respectively. The primary endpoint of the study was survival free of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were needed for target lesion revascularization (TLR), definite stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year, and MACE rate during total follow-up period.
Results: Baseline clinical and angiographic parameters were comparable between the two groups. EES were associated with a higher MACE rate at 1 year compared to DEB (27.5 vs. 8.6%, respectively; P = 0.046). TLR rates for EES and DEB were 22.5% versus 4.3%, respectively, P = 0.029, while rates of definite ST at 1 year follow-up were comparable (2.5% vs. 0%, respectively; P = 0.945). There were no differences in myocardial infarction rates between the two groups (5% vs. 2%, respectively; P = 0.595) and in mortality. Considering the complete follow-up periods, DEB were associated with significantly less MACE compared to EES (log-rank test, P = 0.045). Furthermore, comparison of TLR rates showed a strong trend in favor of DEB compared to EES (P = 0.074).
Conclusions: Treatment of DES-ISR using a DEB is associated with favorable rates of MACE and TLR at 1-year follow-up compared to the implantation of an EES.
Keywords: balloon; drugs; restenosis; stent.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Fixer upper methods.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May 1;83(6):888. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25483. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24753168 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of everolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of drug-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent restenosis.Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Nov;23(7):492-6. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328358a58f. Coron Artery Dis. 2012. PMID: 22990414
-
Two-year outcomes after first- or second-generation drug-eluting or bare-metal stent implantation in all-comer patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pre-specified analysis from the PRODIGY study (PROlonging Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading stent-induced Intimal hyperplasia studY).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):20-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Dec 11. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24332420 Clinical Trial.
-
5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Nov 13. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 24239202 Clinical Trial.
-
Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents for In-Stent Restenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Jul;20(7):612-618. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 16. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019. PMID: 30126824
-
Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Balloons for Patients With In-Stent Restenosis: A Meta-Analysis of 8 Randomized Controlled Trials.Angiology. 2016 Aug;67(7):612-21. doi: 10.1177/0003319715611826. Epub 2015 Oct 18. Angiology. 2016. PMID: 26483569 Review.
Cited by
-
Drug-coated balloon therapy in coronary and peripheral artery disease.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Jan;11(1):13-23. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.165. Epub 2013 Nov 5. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24189405 Review.
-
Is the Sirolimus encapsulated balloon a reliable tool for treating the in-stent restenosis?-insights from the SABRE trial.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Feb;10(2):634-637. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.05. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 29607127 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis: An updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Nov 6;19(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03046-6. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 39506808 Free PMC article.
-
Drug-Eluting Balloon versus New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Mar 5;131(5):600-607. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.226073. Chin Med J (Engl). 2018. PMID: 29483397 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between drug-coated balloon angioplasty and second-generation drug-eluting stent placement for the treatment of in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.Heart Vessels. 2016 Sep;31(9):1405-11. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0741-6. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Heart Vessels. 2016. PMID: 26337620
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous