Impact of carvedilol and metoprolol on inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: the MADIT-CRT trial (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)
- PMID: 23770172
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.087
Impact of carvedilol and metoprolol on inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: the MADIT-CRT trial (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)
Abstract
Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on the endpoint of inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in the MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) study.
Background: The impact of carvedilol and metoprolol on inappropriate therapy in heart failure patients with devices has not yet been investigated.
Methods: All patients in the MADIT-CRT study who received a device (N = 1,790) were identified. Using time-dependent Cox regression analysis, we compared patients treated with different types of beta-blockers or no beta-blockers on the primary endpoint of inappropriate therapy, delivered as antitachycardia pacing (ATP) or shock therapy. Secondary endpoints were inappropriate therapy due to atrial fibrillation and atrial tachyarrhythmias, also evaluated as ATP or shock therapy.
Results: Inappropriate therapy occurred in 253 (14%) of 1,790 patients during a follow-up period of 3.4 ± 1.1 years. Treatment with carvedilol was associated with a significantly decreased risk of inappropriate therapy compared with metoprolol (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48 to 0.85]; p = 0.002). The reduction in risk was consistent for inappropriate ATP (HR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.48 to 0.90]; p = 0.009) and inappropriate shock therapy (HR: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.36 to 0.80]; p = 0.002). The risk of inappropriate therapy caused by atrial fibrillation was also reduced in patients receiving carvedilol compared with metoprolol (HR: 0.50 [95% CI: 0.32 to 0.81]; p = 0.004). General use of beta-blockers (93%) and adherence in this study was high.
Conclusions: In heart failure patients undergoing either cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator or with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device, carvedilol was associated with a 36% lower rate of inappropriate ATP and shock therapy compared with metoprolol. Inappropriate therapy due to atrial fibrillation was associated with a 50% lower rate in patients receiving carvedilol compared with those receiving metoprolol. (MADIT-CRT: Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; NCT00180271).
Keywords: ATP; CI; CRT-D; HR; ICD; antitachycardia pacing; beta-blockers; cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator; confidence interval; defibrillator; hazard ratio; heart failure; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; inappropriate therapy.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Inappropriate implantable defibrillator shocks: an adverse outcome that can be prevented.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 8;62(15):1351-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.055. Epub 2013 Jun 13. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23770170 No abstract available.
-
Reply: Carvedilol versus metoprolol, but which metoprolol? Effect on inappropriate cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 13;63(18):1933-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 30. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24486261 No abstract available.
-
Carvedilol versus metoprolol, but which metoprolol? Effect on inappropriate cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 13;63(18):1933. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.042. Epub 2014 Jan 30. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24486283 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
