Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2013 Nov;209(5):488.e1-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse

Affiliations
Observational Study

Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse

Mamta M Mamik et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: The objectives of this study were to: (1) assess differences in goal attainment of self-described goals after treatment of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) for women who chose surgery compared to women who chose pessary; and (2) compare patient global improvement between groups.

Study design: Women who had symptomatic stage ≥II prolapse presenting for care of POP to the urogynecology clinic at the University of New Mexico were recruited. Patients listed up to 3 goals they had for their treatment. In addition, they completed the short forms of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), the POP/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, and the Body Image Scale. Goals listed by patients were then categorized into 10 categories. Each of the listed goals was categorized based on a consensus of 5 providers. At 3 months' follow-up patients listed if they had met their self-described goals on a scale of 0-10 and also answered the Patient Global Improvement Index (PGI-I).

Results: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups' baseline characteristics. Surgery patients ranked their goal attainment higher than pessary patients for all the 3 goals listed. Similarly, PGI-I scores were also higher in the surgical (2.4 ± 1.1) than the pessary (1.93 ± 0.8) treatment groups (P < .04). Patients in the surgery group also had better symptom improvement as measured by the PFDI-20 (P < .02).

Conclusion: Patients who chose surgery had better global improvement and met their goals better compared to patients who chose pessary.

Keywords: pessary surgery goal attainment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest except for Dr. RG Rogers who is the DSMB chair of the TRANSFORM trial sponsored by the American Medical Systems

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patients included in the study

References

    1. Kiresuk T, Sherman R. Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating community mental health programs. Commun Ment Health J. 1968;4:443–453. - PubMed
    1. Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1551–1557. discussion 1557-8. - PubMed
    1. Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Steers WD. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):201–205. - PubMed
    1. Komesu YM, Rogers RG, Rode MA, Craig EC, Schrader RM, Gallegos KA, Villareal B. Patient-selected goal attainment for pessary wearers: what is the clinical relevance? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):577.e1–577.e5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;185(6):1388–1395. - PubMed

Publication types