Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun 1;23(2):345-356.
doi: 10.1111/jora.12001.

Trajectories of Reinforcement Sensitivity During Adolescence and Risk for Substance Use

Affiliations

Trajectories of Reinforcement Sensitivity During Adolescence and Risk for Substance Use

Craig R Colder et al. J Res Adolesc. .

Abstract

Developmental neuroscience models suggest that changes in responsiveness to incentives contribute to increases in adolescent risk behavior, including substance use. Trajectories of sensitivity to reward (SR) and sensitivity to punishment (SP) were examined and tested as predictors of escalation of early substance use in a community sample of adolescents (N=765, mean baseline age 11.8 years, 54% female). SR and SP were assessed using a laboratory task. Across three annual assessments, SR increased, and rapid escalation was associated with increases in substance use. SP declined and was unrelated to substance use. Findings support contemporary views of adolescent brain development, and suggest that early adolescent substance use is motivated by approach responses to reward, rather than failure to avoid potential aversive consequences.

Keywords: adolescence; punishment sensitivity; reward sensitivity; substance use; trajectories.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design of the Point Scoring Reaction Time Task for Children Revised (PSRTT-CR). Note: Each experimental block included 50 trials (3 seconds each). Feedback was provided on all trials in experimental blocks for 500 ms, including whether the response was correct or incorrect, points earned, and total accumulated points. Incorrect discriminations resulted in a loss of 2 points in all experimental blocks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Model Implied Growth Trajectories of senstivity to reward (SR) and senstivity to punishment (SP). Note: Declines in reaction time in the reward condition corresponds to increases in SR, and declines reaction in response to punishment cues corresponds to declines in SP.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Youth self-report for ages 11-18. ASEBA; Burlington, VT: 2001.
    1. Avila C. Distinguishing BIS-mediated and BAS-mediated disinhibition mechanisms: A comparison of disinhibition models of Gray (1981, 1987) and of Patterson and Newman (1993). Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 2001;80(2):311–324. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.311. - PubMed
    1. Bjork JM, Smith AR, Danube CL, Hommer DW. Developmental differences in posterior mesofrontal cortex recruitment by risky rewards. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27(18):4839–4849. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.5469-06.2007. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blonigen DM, Carlson MD, Hicks BM, Krueger RFI, W.G. Stability and change in personality traits from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study. Journal of Personality. 2008;76(2):229–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00485.x. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casey BJ, Jones RM, Hare TA. The Adolescent Brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2008;1124(1):111–126. doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.010. - PMC - PubMed