Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2014 Jan;77(1):160-9.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.12182.

CYP3A activity in severe liver cirrhosis correlates with Child-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

CYP3A activity in severe liver cirrhosis correlates with Child-Pugh and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores

Albader Albarmawi et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: Impaired liver function often necessitates drug dose adjustment to avoid excessive drug accumulation and adverse events, but a marker for the extent of the required adjustment is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Child-Pugh (CP) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores correlate with drug clearance.

Methods: Midazolam was used as a CYP3A probe and its pharmacokinetics were analyzed in 24 patients with mild to severe liver cirrhosis (n = 4, 10 and 10 with CP class A, B and C, respectively) and six patients without liver disease.

Results: Both scores correlated well with unbound midazolam clearance (CLu ), unbound midazolam fraction and half-life (all P < 0.01), whereas the unbound steady-state volume of distribution was not significantly changed. In patients with severe liver cirrhosis unbound midazolam clearance was only 14% of controls (CP C: CLu = 843 ± 346 l h(-1), MELD ≥ 15: CLu = 805 ± 474 l h(-1), controls: CLu = 5815 ± 2649 l h(-1), P < 0.01).

Conclusion: The correlation with unbound midazolam clearance suggests that either score predicts the metabolic capacity of CYP3A, the most relevant drug metabolizing enzyme subfamily in humans.

Keywords: Child-Pugh score; MELD score; cytochrome P450 CYP3A; liver cirrhosis; midazolam; pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between Child–Pugh and model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores in patients with liver cirrhosis (small circles and squares; squares indicate two patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, filled symbols indicate two patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, r2 = 0.68, P < 0.01). Control patients without liver disease are indicated by large grey circles
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose-normalized midazolam (black continuous lines) and 1′-hydroxymidazolam (blue broken lines) plasma concentration–time profiles in patients with liver cirrhosis grouped according to Child–Pugh class and MELD score categories (thin lines) and patients without liver disease (Control, thick lines). Error bars indicate SEMs
Figure 3
Figure 3
Midazolam plasma clearance in patients with liver cirrhosis (small circles and squares; squares indicate two patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, filled symbols indicate two patients with primary biliary cirrhosis) and control patients without liver disease (large grey circles). All correlations were highly significant (P < 0.01, Table 3)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Unbound midazolam fraction and plasma half-life in patients with liver cirrhosis (small circles and squares; squares indicate two patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, filled symbols indicate two patients with primary biliary cirrhosis) and control patients without liver disease (large grey circles). Unbound fraction: Spearman ρ = 0.75 (95% CI 0.52, 0.88) for Child–Pugh score and 0.61 (95% CI 0.31, 0.80) for MELD score. Half-life: Spearman ρ = 0.75 (95% CI 0.52, 0.88) for Child–Pugh score and 0.76 (95% CI 0.50, 0.88) for MELD score (all P < 0.01)

References

    1. Verbeeck RK. Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;64:1147–1161. - PubMed
    1. Delcò F, Tchambaz L, Schlienger R, Drewe J, Krähenbühl S. Dose adjustment in patients with liver disease. Drug Saf. 2005;28:529–545. - PubMed
    1. Spray JW, Willett K, Chase D, Sindelar R, Connelly S. Dosage adjustment for hepatic dysfunction based on Child-Pugh scores. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64:690–693. - PubMed
    1. Amariles P, Lacampa P, Saez-Benito L. Dosage adjustments in hepatic dysfunction. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007;64:2536–2538. - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired hepatic function: study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. May 2003. Available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformati... (last accessed 3 December 2012)

Publication types