Sensitivity and specificity of a procedure for early human screening of novel smoking cessation medications
- PMID: 23773319
- PMCID: PMC3797155
- DOI: 10.1111/add.12273
Sensitivity and specificity of a procedure for early human screening of novel smoking cessation medications
Abstract
Background and aim: It is important to find economical methods in early Phase 2 studies to screen drugs potentially useful to aid smoking cessation. A method has been developed that detects efficacy of varenicline and nicotine patch. This study aimed to evaluate whether the method would detect the efficacy of bupropion and identify correctly the lack of efficacy of modafinil.
Design: Using a within-subject double cross-over design, smokers attempted to quit during each treatment, with bupropion (150 mg b.i.d.), modafinil [100 mg twice daily (b.i.d.)] or placebo (double-blind, counterbalanced order). In each of three medication periods, all smoked with no drug on week 1 (baseline or washout), began dose run-up on week 2, and tried to quit every day during week 3.
Setting: A university research center in the United States.
Participants: Forty-five adult smokers high in quit interest.
Measurements: Abstinence was verified daily each quit week by self-report of no smoking over the prior 24 hours and carbon monoxide (CO) < 5 parts per million.
Findings: Compared with placebo, bupropion did (F(1,44) = 6.98, P = 0.01), but modafinil did not (F(1,44) = 0.29, P = 0.60), increase the number of abstinent days. Also, bupropion (versus placebo) significantly increased the number of those able to maintain continuous abstinence on all 5 days throughout the quit week (11 versus four), Z = 2.11, P < 0.05, while modafinil did not (six).
Conclusions: Assessing days abstinent during 1 week of use of medication versus placebo in a cross-over design could be a useful early Phase 2 study design for discriminating between medications useful versus not useful in aiding smoking cessation.
Keywords: Bupropion; medication development; modafinil; pharmacotherapy; sensitivity; smoking cessation; specificity.
© 2013 Society for the Study of Addiction.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Sparks, Mr. Karelitz, and Ms. Jao have no potential conflicts of interest or disclosures to report.
Figures
References
-
- Benowitz NL, Peng MW. Non-nicotine pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. CNS Drugs. 2000;13:265–285.
-
- Foulds J, Steinberg MB, Williams JM, Ziedonis D. Developments in pharmacotherapy for tobacco dependence: past, present and future. Drug Alc Rev. 2006;25:59–71. - PubMed
-
- Hughes JR, Goldstein MG, Hurt RD, Shiffman S. Recent advances in the pharmacotherapy of smoking. JAMA. 1999;281:72–76. - PubMed
-
- Lerman C, LeSage MG, Perkins KA, O’Malley SS, Siegel SJ, Benowitz NL, Corrigall WA. Translational research in medication development for nicotine dependence. Nature Rev Drug Dev. 2007;6:746–762. - PubMed
-
- Paul SM, Mytelka DS, Dunwiddie CT, Persinger CC, Munos BH, Lindborg SR, Schacht AL. How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry’s grand challenge. Nature Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:203–214. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
