Why is the 3500 kcal per pound weight loss rule wrong?
- PMID: 23774459
- PMCID: PMC3859816
- DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2013.112
Why is the 3500 kcal per pound weight loss rule wrong?
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Response to 'Why is the 3500 kcal per pound weight loss rule wrong?'.Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Dec;37(12):1614-5. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.113. Epub 2013 Jun 18. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013. PMID: 23774461 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Can a weight loss of one pound a week be achieved with a 3500-kcal deficit? Commentary on a commonly accepted rule.Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Dec;37(12):1611-3. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.51. Epub 2013 Apr 8. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013. PMID: 23628852 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lin BH, Smith TA, Lee JY, Hall KD. Measuring weight outcomes for obesity intervention strategies: the case of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Econ Hum Biol. 2011;9:329–341. - PubMed
-
- Hall KD. Modeling metabolic adaptations and energy regulation in humans. Annu Rev Nutr. 2012;32:35–54. - PubMed
-
- Wishnofsky M. Caloric equivalents of gained or lost weight. Am J Clin Nutr. 1958;6:542–546. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
