Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research
- PMID: 23774513
- PMCID: PMC3771694
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1d84
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research
Abstract
Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) aims to improve care quality and patient outcomes by providing information that patients, clinicians, and family members need regarding treatment alternatives, and emphasizing patient input to inform the research process. PCOR capitalizes on available data sources and generates new evidence to provide timely and relevant information and can be conducted using prospective data collection, disease registries, electronic medical records, aggregated results from prior research, and administrative claims. Given PCOR's emphasis on the patient perspective, methods to incorporate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are critical. PROs are defined by the US Food and Drug Administration as "Any report coming directly from patients… about a health condition and its treatment." However, PROs have not routinely been collected in a way that facilitates their use in PCOR. Electronic medical records, disease registries, and administrative data have only rarely collected, or been linked to, PROs. Recent technological developments facilitate the electronic collection of PROs and linkage of PRO data, offering new opportunities for putting the patient perspective in PCOR. This paper describes the importance of and methods for using PROs for PCOR. We (1) define PROs; (2) identify how PROs can be used in PCOR and the critical role of electronic data methods for facilitating the use of PRO data in PCOR; (3) outline the challenges and key unanswered questions that need to be addressed for the routine use of PROs in PCOR; and (4) discuss policy and research interventions to accelerate the integration of PROs with clinical data.
Figures

Similar articles
-
A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State's Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8 Suppl):S122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.007. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23849146 Free PMC article.
-
The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.Med Care. 2012 Dec;50(12):1060-70. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268aaff. Med Care. 2012. PMID: 22922434
-
ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):1889-905. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0344-y. Epub 2013 Jan 4. Qual Life Res. 2013. PMID: 23288613 Review.
-
Developing Methods to Link Patient Records across Data Sets That Preserve Patient Privacy [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020 Jun. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020 Jun. PMID: 37535796 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Developing Recommendations for Oversight of Patient-Centered Outcomes Research—The PCOROS Study [Internet].Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020 Aug. Washington (DC): Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI); 2020 Aug. PMID: 38556971 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
A Review of HIV-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.Patient. 2017 Apr;10(2):187-202. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0195-7. Patient. 2017. PMID: 27637488 Review.
-
Efficiency, Precision, Validity, and Reliability of GlauCAT-Asian Computerized Adaptive Tests in Measuring Glaucoma-Related Quality of Life.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Feb 1;13(2):6. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.2.6. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024. PMID: 38329749 Free PMC article.
-
[Health services research in intensive care medicine in Germany : Status quo and future challenges exemplified by acute pulmonary failure].Anaesthesist. 2019 Jun;68(6):343-352. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-0602-2. Anaesthesist. 2019. PMID: 31101923 Review. German.
-
Multistakeholder Qualitative Research Methods to Impact Culture of Care Practices in the ICU.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul;19(7):688-690. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001564. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 29985295 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reliability of an e-PRO Tool of EORTC QLQ-C30 for Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer: Prospective Randomized Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 14;19(9):e322. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8210. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28912116 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [Accessed December 10, 2012];What is Comparative Effectiveness Research. Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/what-is-comparative-ef...
-
- Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. [Accessed December 10, 2012]; Available at: http://www.pcori.org/
-
- U S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Federal Register. 2009;74(35):65132–3.
-
- National Quality Forum. [Accessed December 10, 2012];Patient-Reported Outcomes. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/n-r/Patient-Reported_Outcomes/Patie....
-
- Acquadro C, Berzon R, Dubois D, et al. Incorporating the patient’s perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group Meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value Health. 2003;6:522–31. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous