Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;51(8 Suppl 3):S73-9.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1d84.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research

Affiliations

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research

Claire F Snyder et al. Med Care. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) aims to improve care quality and patient outcomes by providing information that patients, clinicians, and family members need regarding treatment alternatives, and emphasizing patient input to inform the research process. PCOR capitalizes on available data sources and generates new evidence to provide timely and relevant information and can be conducted using prospective data collection, disease registries, electronic medical records, aggregated results from prior research, and administrative claims. Given PCOR's emphasis on the patient perspective, methods to incorporate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are critical. PROs are defined by the US Food and Drug Administration as "Any report coming directly from patients… about a health condition and its treatment." However, PROs have not routinely been collected in a way that facilitates their use in PCOR. Electronic medical records, disease registries, and administrative data have only rarely collected, or been linked to, PROs. Recent technological developments facilitate the electronic collection of PROs and linkage of PRO data, offering new opportunities for putting the patient perspective in PCOR. This paper describes the importance of and methods for using PROs for PCOR. We (1) define PROs; (2) identify how PROs can be used in PCOR and the critical role of electronic data methods for facilitating the use of PRO data in PCOR; (3) outline the challenges and key unanswered questions that need to be addressed for the routine use of PROs in PCOR; and (4) discuss policy and research interventions to accelerate the integration of PROs with clinical data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The applications of PROs in PCOR build off their use in population surveillance, in research studies, and in clinical encounters for individual patients. These sources of PRO data can be linked with clinical data from a variety of sources to create PCOR datasets. The use of PROs in PCOR produces data to inform patients, providers, and policy-makers. In addition, PRO data may serve as a key prognostic covariate to address methodologic issues associated with observational data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [Accessed December 10, 2012];What is Comparative Effectiveness Research. Available at: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/what-is-comparative-ef...
    1. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. [Accessed December 10, 2012]; Available at: http://www.pcori.org/
    1. U S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Federal Register. 2009;74(35):65132–3.
    1. National Quality Forum. [Accessed December 10, 2012];Patient-Reported Outcomes. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/Projects/n-r/Patient-Reported_Outcomes/Patie....
    1. Acquadro C, Berzon R, Dubois D, et al. Incorporating the patient’s perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group Meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value Health. 2003;6:522–31. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms