Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;67(9):751-7.
doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-202080. Epub 2013 Jun 17.

Improving equity by removing healthcare fees for children in Burkina Faso

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Improving equity by removing healthcare fees for children in Burkina Faso

V Ridde et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Sep.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the effects on healthcare access inequities of an intervention exempting children under 5 years from user fees in Burkina Faso.

Methods: The design consisted of two complementary studies. The first was an interrupted time series (56 months before and 12 months after) study of daily curative consultations according to distance (<5, 5-9 and ≥10 km) in a stratified random sample of 18 health centres: 12 with the intervention and 6 without. The second was a household panel survey (n=1214) assessing the evolution of health-seeking behaviours. Multilevel regression was used throughout.

Results: Attendance doubled under the intervention, after adjusting for Centres de Santé et de Promotion Sociale size, districts, secular trend and seasonal variation. Utilisation increased for all distance ranges and in all of the 12 health centres of the intervention area. The exemption benefited all children (rate ratios (RR)=1.52 (1.23 to 1.88)), whether their health needs were high (RR=1.69 (1.22 to 2.32)) or not (RR=1.46 (1.10 to 1.93)) and whether the children lived near (RR=1.42 (1.09 to 1.85)) or far from a health centre (RR=1.79 (1.31 to 2.43)). The exemption benefited the children of poor families when health need was high and services near (RR=5.23; (1.30 to 20.99)). The amount saved for a child's treatment by the exemption was on average and median 2500 F CFA (≈US$5).

Conclusions: Exempting children under five from user fees is effective and helps reduce inequities of access. It benefits vulnerable populations, although their service utilisation remains constrained by limitations in geographic accessibility of services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of daily visits of children under five in CSPS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Health expenditure distributions according to illness severity.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Health expenditure distributions according to income groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Health expenditure distributions according to place of residence

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lagarde M, Palmer N. The impact of user fees on access to health services in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(4):CD009094. - PMC - PubMed
    1. James C, Morris SS, Keith R, et al. Impact on child mortality of removing user fees: simulation model. BMJ 2005;331:747–9 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meessen B, Hercot D, Noirhomme M, et al. Removing user fees in the health sector: a review of policy processes in six sub-Saharan African countries. Health Policy Plan (Suppl 2) 2011;26:ii16–29 - PubMed
    1. McIntyre D, Ataguba JE. How to do (or not to do) … a benefit incidence analysis. Health Policy Plan 2010;26:174–82 - PubMed
    1. Castro-Leal F, Dayton J, Demery L, et al. Public spending on health care in Africa: do the poor benefit? Bull World Health Organ 2000;78:66–74 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms