Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013;10(6):e1001465.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001465. Epub 2013 Jun 11.

Diet and physical activity for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic policy review

Affiliations
Review

Diet and physical activity for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic policy review

Carl Lachat et al. PLoS Med. 2013.

Abstract

Background: Diet-related noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are increasing rapidly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and constitute a leading cause of mortality. Although a call for global action has been resonating for years, the progress in national policy development in LMICs has not been assessed. This review of strategies to prevent NCDs in LMICs provides a benchmark against which policy response can be tracked over time.

Methods and findings: We reviewed how government policies in LMICs outline actions that address salt consumption, fat consumption, fruit and vegetable intake, or physical activity. A structured content analysis of national nutrition, NCDs, and health policies published between 1 January 2004 and 1 January 2013 by 140 LMIC members of the World Health Organization (WHO) was carried out. We assessed availability of policies in 83% (116/140) of the countries. NCD strategies were found in 47% (54/116) of LMICs reviewed, but only a minority proposed actions to promote healthier diets and physical activity. The coverage of policies that specifically targeted at least one of the risk factors reviewed was lower in Africa, Europe, the Americas, and the Eastern Mediterranean compared to the other two World Health Organization regions, South-East Asia and Western Pacific. Of the countries reviewed, only 12% (14/116) proposed a policy that addressed all four risk factors, and 25% (29/116) addressed only one of the risk factors reviewed. Strategies targeting the private sector were less frequently encountered than strategies targeting the general public or policy makers.

Conclusions: This review indicates the disconnection between the burden of NCDs and national policy responses in LMICs. Policy makers urgently need to develop comprehensive and multi-stakeholder policies to improve dietary quality and physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Coding tree for policy actions analyzed in the documents.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Selection process of nutrition, noncommunicable diseases, and health policies from low- and middle- income countries.
The WHO classification of regions and allocation of countries was used. AFR, African Region; AMR, Region of the Americas; EMR, Eastern Mediterranean Region; EUR, European Region; SEAR, South-East Asia Region; WPR, Western Pacific Region. Mayotte, West Bank and Gaza, the Republic of Kosovo, and American Samoa. *Antigua and Barbuda, Egypt, Dominica, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Sao Tome and Principe, Dominican Republic, Micronesia, Gabon, Tonga, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Libya, Algeria, Iraq, Lithuania, Palau, Marshall Islands, Uzbekistan, Yemen, Romania, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Syrian Arab Republic, Turkmenistan, and Comoros. §Policy issued before 2004: Belize, Venezuela, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Eritrea, Lesotho, Papua New Guinea, Albania, Armenia, Burundi, Ecuador, El Salvador, Kiribati, Namibia, Sierra Leone, Gambia, Zimbabwe, Somalia, United Republic of Tanzania, and Vanuatu; policy not officially endorsed: Democratic Republic of the Congo, Senegal, and Tuvalu; no policy : Chad, Congo, South Africa, and Tajikistan; policy was available but could not be publically distributed: Central African Republic, Cameroon, and Tunisia; policy reported to be available but could not be obtained: Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Atlas of availability of national actions to limit salt or fat intake or increase fruit and vegetable intake or physical activity.
Geographic boundaries from the United Nations Cartographic Section were used .

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization (2011) Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Abegunde DO, Mathers CD, Adam T, Ortegon M, Strong K (2007) Chronic diseases 1—the burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 370: 1929–1938 ISI:000251517600031. - PubMed
    1. Bloom DE, Cafiero ET, Jané-Llopis E, Abrahams-Gessel S, Bloom LR, et al... (2011) The global economic burden of noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Economic Forum. 48 p.
    1. Cecchini M, Sassi F, Lauer JA, Lee YY, Guajardo-Barron V, et al. (2010) Tackling of unhealthy diets, physical inactivity, and obesity: health effects and cost-effectiveness. Lancet 376: 1775–1784 ISI:000284984900033. - PubMed
    1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, et al. (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380: 2224–2260. - PMC - PubMed