Treatment of periprosthetic infections: an economic analysis
- PMID: 23781163
- PMCID: PMC3679762
- DOI: 10.1155/2013/821650
Treatment of periprosthetic infections: an economic analysis
Abstract
This review summarizes the existing economic literature, assesses the value of current data, and presents procedures that are the less costly and more effective options for the treatment of periprosthetic infections of knee and hip. Optimizing antibiotic use in the prevention and treatment of periprosthetic infection, combined with systemic and behavioral changes in the operating room, the detection and treatment of high-risk patient groups, as well as the rational management of the existing infection by using the different procedures according to each particular case, could allow for improved outcomes and lead to the highest quality of life for patients and the lowest economic impact. Nevertheless, the cost-effectiveness of different interventions to treat periprosthetic infections remains unclear.
References
-
- Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail DTP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the united states. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A. 2009;91(1):128–133. - PubMed
-
- Bohm ER, Dunbar MJ, Frood JJ, Johnson TM, Morris KA. Rehospitalizations, early revisions, infections, and hospital resource use in the first year after hip and knee arthroplasties. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2012;27(2):232–237. - PubMed
-
- Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, et al. Future clinical and economic impact of revision total hip and knee arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A. 2007;89(supplement 3):144–151. - PubMed
-
- Brauer CA, Bozic KJ. Using observational data for decision analysis and economic analysis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery A. 2009;91(supplement 3):73–79. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
