Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Aug;98(2):134-44.
doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70007-Y.

A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion

J A McNamara Jr et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Aug.

Abstract

This study investigated the treatment effects produced by two types of functional appliance, one primarily tooth-borne (the Herbst appliance) and one primarily tissue-borne (the FR-2 of Fränkel). Serial cephalometric radiographs from 45 patients who had been treated with the acrylic splint Herbst appliance and from 41 patients who had been treated with the FR-2 appliance were compared with serial radiographs of 21 untreated persons with Class II malocclusions. Treatment effects were identified through the use of a conventional cephalometric analysis. The results of this study indicated that both appliances had influenced the growth of the craniofacial complex in treated persons. Significant skeletal changes were noted in both treatment groups, with both groups showing an increase in mandibular length and in lower facial height, as compared with controls. Greater dentoalveolar treatment effects were noted in the group wearing the tooth-borne functional appliance than in those wearing the tissue-borne appliance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources