BLINCK-A diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings
- PMID: 23785600
- PMCID: PMC3663344
- DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0202a12
BLINCK-A diagnostic algorithm for skin cancer diagnosis combining clinical features with dermatoscopy findings
Abstract
Background: Deciding whether a skin lesion requires biopsy to exclude skin cancer is often challenging for primary care clinicians in Australia. There are several published algorithms designed to assist with the diagnosis of skin cancer but apart from the clinical ABCD rule, these algorithms only evaluate the dermatoscopic features of a lesion.
Objectives: The BLINCK algorithm explores the effect of combining clinical history and examination with fundamental dermatoscopic assessment in primary care skin cancer practice.
Patients/methods: Clinical and dermatoscopic images of 50 skin lesions were collected and shown to four primary care practitioners. The cases were assessed by each participant and lesions requiring biopsy were determined on separate occasions using the 3-Point Checklist, the Menzies method, clinical assessment alone and the BLINCK algorithm.
Results: The BLINCK algorithm had the highest sensitivity and found more melanomas than any of the other methods. However, BLINCK required more biopsies than the other methods. When comparing diagnostic accuracy, there was no difference between BLINCK, Menzies method and clinical assessment but all were better than the 3-Point checklist.
Conclusions: These results suggest that the BLINK algorithm may be a useful skin cancer screening tool for Australian primary care practice.
Keywords: BLINCK; diagnostic algorithm; melanoma; primary care; skin cancer.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Comparison of dermatoscopic diagnostic algorithms based on calculation: The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy, the seven-point checklist, the three-point checklist and the CASH algorithm in dermatoscopic evaluation of melanocytic lesions.J Dermatol. 2014 Jul;41(7):598-603. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.12491. Epub 2014 May 8. J Dermatol. 2014. PMID: 24807635
-
The dermatoscopic ABCD rule does not improve diagnostic accuracy of malignant melanoma.Acta Derm Venereol. 1999 Nov;79(6):469-72. doi: 10.1080/000155599750009942. Acta Derm Venereol. 1999. PMID: 10598764
-
Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.Arch Dermatol. 2005 Aug;141(8):1008-14. doi: 10.1001/archderm.141.8.1008. Arch Dermatol. 2005. PMID: 16103330
-
Role of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in the Analysis of Melanocytic Lesions.Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018 Apr;26(1):64-67. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018. PMID: 29782304 Review.
-
Dermatoscopy for melanoma and pigmented lesions.Dermatol Clin. 2012 Jul;30(3):413-34. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2012.04.005. Dermatol Clin. 2012. PMID: 22800549 Review.
Cited by
-
Lesion-directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice: an observational study.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Jun;35(6):1309-1314. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17129. Epub 2021 Feb 12. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021. PMID: 33480073 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Skin Cancer Diagnostics Through a Mobile App With a Large Interactive Image Repository: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Dermatol. 2023 Aug 9;6:e48357. doi: 10.2196/48357. JMIR Dermatol. 2023. PMID: 37624707 Free PMC article.
-
Glowing in the dark: case report of a clue-poor melanoma unmasked by polarized dermatoscopy.Dermatol Pract Concept. 2014 Jan 31;4(1):83-7. doi: 10.5826/dpc.0401a14. eCollection 2014 Jan. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2014. PMID: 24520521 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity and Specificity for Skin Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care Providers: a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis of Educational Interventions and Diagnostic Algorithms.J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1563-1572. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02194-4. Epub 2022 Jul 14. J Cancer Educ. 2022. PMID: 35834156 Free PMC article.
-
Dermoscopy for melanoma detection and triage in primary care: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e027529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027529. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31434767 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Zalaudek I, Argenziano G, Soyer HP, et al. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open internet study. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154(3):431–7. - PubMed
-
- Menzies SW, Ingvar C, Crotty KA, McCarthy WH. Frequency and morphologic characteristics of invasive melanomas lacking specific surface microscopic features. Arch Dermatol. 1996;132(10):1178–82. - PubMed
-
- Grob JJ, Bonerandi JJ. The ‘ugly duckling’ sign: identification of the common characteristics of nevi in an individual as a basis for melanoma screening. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134(1):103–4. - PubMed
-
- Scope A, Dusza SW, Halpern AC, et al. The “Ugly Duckling” Sign: Agreement Between Observers. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(1):58–64. - PubMed
-
- Kittler H. Why the first step should be abandoned! Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(10):1182–3. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources