Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;42(2):97-105.
doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12056. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of dental care services in Europe: what is the role of public coverage?

Affiliations

Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of dental care services in Europe: what is the role of public coverage?

Laia Palència et al. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse inequalities in the use of dental care services according to socioeconomic position (SEP) in individuals aged ≥50 years in European countries in 2006, to examine the association between the degree of public coverage of dental services and the extent of inequalities, and specifically to determine whether countries with higher public health coverage show lower inequalities.

Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study of 12 364 men and 14 692 women aged ≥50 years from 11 European countries. Data were extracted from the second wave of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE 2006). The dependent variable was use of dental care services within the previous year, and the independent variables were education level as a measure of SEP, whether services were covered to some degree by the country's public health system, and chewing ability as a marker of individuals' need for dental services. Age-standardized prevalence of the use of dental care as a function of SEP was calculated, and age-adjusted indices of relative inequality (RII) were computed for each type of dental coverage, sex and chewing ability.

Results: Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of dental care services were higher in countries where no public dental care cover was provided than in countries where there was some degree of public coverage. For example, men with chewing ability from countries with dental care coverage had a RII of 1.39 (95%CI: 1.29-1.51), while those from countries without coverage had a RII of 1.96 (95%CI: 1.72-2.23). Women without chewing ability from countries with dental care coverage had a RII of 2.15 (95%CI: 1.82-2.52), while those from countries without coverage had a RII of 3.02 (95%CI: 2.47-3.69).

Conclusions: Dental systems relying on public coverage seem to show lower inequalities in their use, thus confirming the potential benefits of such systems.

Keywords: dental health care; public coverage; socioeconomic factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative Index of Inequality (RII) (highest education level compared to lowest) and 95% confidence intervals stratified by type of dental care coverage (partially covered and not covered), chewing ability (normal and reduced) and sex.

Comment in

References

    1. Kwan S, Petersen PE. Equity, social determinants and public health programmes. WHO; 2010. Oral health: equity and social determinants. - PubMed
    1. Spencer J, Harford J. Inequality in oral health in Australia. In: Symposium: Is it Time for a Universal Dental Scheme in Australia? Australian Review of Public Affairs. 2007
    1. Marmot M, Bell R. Social determinants and dental health. Adv Dent Res. 2011;23(2):201–206. - PubMed
    1. Sisson KL. Theoretical explanations for social inequalities in oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35(2):81–88. - PubMed
    1. Thomson WM, Williams SM, Broadbent JM, et al. Long-term dental visiting patterns and adult oral health. J Dent Res. 2010;89(3):307–311. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms