Interpretative problems with chimpanzee ultimatum game
- PMID: 23788658
- PMCID: PMC3746928
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1307007110
Interpretative problems with chimpanzee ultimatum game
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Reply to Henrich and Silk: Toward a unified explanation for apes and humans.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 13;110(33):E3050. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309100110. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013. PMID: 24137630 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Chimpanzees play the ultimatum game.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 5;110(6):2070-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220806110. Epub 2013 Jan 14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013. PMID: 23319633 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Henrich J, et al. Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science. 2010;327(5972):1480–1484. - PubMed
-
- Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci. 2010;33(2–3):61–83, discussion 83–135. - PubMed
-
- Carpenter J, Burks S, Verhoogen E. Comparing students to workers: The effects of social framing on behavior in distribution games. In: Carpenter J, Harrison GW, List JA, editors. Field Experiments in Economics. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI; 2005.
-
- Gowdy J, Iorgulescu R, Onyeiwu S. Fairness and retaliation in a rural Nigerian village. J Econ Behav Organ. 2003;52(4):469–479.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources