Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;45(1):49-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.023.

Promotion of healthy eating through public policy: a controlled experiment

Affiliations

Promotion of healthy eating through public policy: a controlled experiment

Brian Elbel et al. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Background: To induce consumers to purchase healthier foods and beverages, some policymakers have suggested special taxes or labels on unhealthy products. The potential of such policies is unknown.

Purpose: In a controlled field experiment, researchers tested whether consumers were more likely to purchase healthy products under such policies.

Methods: From October to December 2011, researchers opened a store at a large hospital that sold a variety of healthier and less-healthy foods and beverages. Purchases (N=3680) were analyzed under five conditions: a baseline with no special labeling or taxation, a 30% tax, highlighting the phrase "less healthy" on the price tag, and combinations of taxation and labeling. Purchases were analyzed in January-July 2012, at the single-item and transaction levels.

Results: There was no significant difference between the various taxation conditions. Consumers were 11 percentage points more likely to purchase a healthier item under a 30% tax (95% CI=7%, 16%, p<0.001) and 6 percentage points more likely under labeling (95% CI=0%, 12%, p=0.04). By product type, consumers switched away from the purchase of less-healthy food under taxation (9 percentage point decrease, p<0.001) and into healthier beverages (6 percentage point increase, p=0.001); there were no effects for labeling. Conditions were associated with the purchase of 11-14 fewer calories (9%-11% in relative terms) and 2 fewer grams of sugar. Results remained significant controlling for all items purchased in a single transaction.

Conclusions: Taxation may induce consumers to purchase healthier foods and beverages. However, it is unclear whether the 15%-20% tax rates proposed in public policy discussions would be more effective than labeling products as less healthy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Purchases of healthier items under highlighting and tax conditions

References

    1. Glickman D, Parker L, Sim L, Cook H, Miller E. Accelerating progress in obesity prevention: solving the weight of the nation. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press; 2012. - PubMed
    1. Harnack LJ, French SA, Oakes JM, Story MT, Jeffery RW, Rydell SA. Effects of calorie labeling and value size pricing on fast food meal choices: Results from an experimental trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5(5):63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elbel B, Kersh R, Brescoll V, Dixon L. Calorie labeling and food choices: a first look at the effects on low-income people in New York City. Health Aff. 2009;28(6):w1110–21. - PubMed
    1. Elbel B, Gyamfi J, Kersh R. Child and adolescent fast-food choice and the influence of calorie labeling: a natural experiment. Int J Obes. 2011;35(4):493–500. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vadiveloo M, Dixon L, Elbel B. Consumer purchasing patterns in response to calorie labeling legislation in New York City. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. 2011;8(1):51. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources