Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):1476-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.088. Epub 2013 Jun 19.

Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Computed tomography angiography and myocardial computed tomography perfusion in patients with coronary stents: prospective intraindividual comparison with conventional coronary angiography

Matthias Rief et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .
Free article

Erratum in

  • J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 11;63(9):944

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether adding myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) to computed tomography angiography (CTA) improves diagnostic performance for coronary stents.

Background: CTA of coronary stents has been limited by nondiagnostic studies caused by metallic stent material and coronary motion.

Methods: CTA and CTP were performed in 91 consecutive patients with stents before quantitative coronary angiography, the reference standard for obstructive stenosis (≥50%). If a coronary stent or vessel was nondiagnostic on CTA, adenosine stress CTP in the corresponding myocardial territory was read for combined CTA/CTP.

Results: Patients had an average of 2.5 ± 1.8 coronary stents (1 to 10), with a diameter of 3.0 ± 0.5 mm. Significantly more patients were nondiagnostic for stent assessment by CTA (22%; mainly due to metal artifacts [75%] or motion [25%]) versus CTP (1%; p < 0.001; severe angina precluded CTP in 1 case). The per-patient diagnostic accuracy of CTA/CTP for stents (87%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 78% to 93%) was significantly higher than that of CTA alone (71%, 95% CI: 61% to 80%; p < 0.001), mainly because nondiagnostic examinations were significantly reduced (p < 0.001). In the analysis of any coronary artery disease, diagnostic accuracy and nondiagnostic rate were also significantly improved by the addition of CTP (p < 0.001). CTA/CTP (7.9 ± 2.8 mSv) had a significantly lower effective radiation dose than angiography (9.5 ± 5.1 mSv; p = 0.005). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for CTA/CTP (0.82, 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.95) was superior to that for CTA (0.69, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.82; p < 0.001) in identifying patients requiring stent revascularization.

Conclusions: Combined coronary CTA and myocardial CTP improves diagnosis of CAD and in-stent restenosis in patients with stents compared with CTA alone. (Coronary Artery Stent Evaluation With 320-Slice Computed Tomography-The CArS 320 Study [CARS-320]; NCT00967876).

Keywords: CCA; CI; CT; CTA; CTP; ISR; QCA; ROC; computed tomography; computed tomography angiography; computed tomography perfusion; confidence interval(s); conventional coronary angiography; coronary angiography; coronary vessels; diagnostic accuracy; in-stent restenosis; quantitative coronary angiography; receiver-operating characteristic; stents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data