Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2013;14(2):38-9.
doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400927.

Only limited evidence available for the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of dental auxiliaries

Affiliations
Comment

Only limited evidence available for the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of dental auxiliaries

Derek Richards. Evid Based Dent. 2013.

Abstract

Data sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, OpenGrey (System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe [SIGLE]-based), Scirus, Science.gov, Cost-Effective Analysis (CEA) Registry, European Network of Health Economics Evaluation Databases (EURON-HEED), ClinicalTrials.gov and Health Services Research Projects in Progress (HSRProj) databases. They also contacted 20 separate organisations.

Study selection: All study designs were considered with no limits on dates, age of study, language or country. Government reports, peer-reviewed publications, dissertations and theses were included. Editorials, opinion pieces, educational pieces, narrative reviews, abstracts without full-text availability and raw data such as those from national oral health surveys were excluded. Study quality and risk of bias was assessed.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction was conducted independently, and meta-analysis was planned for the data, but only a qualitative synthesis could be conducted.

Results: Eighteen observational studies were included, 13 were considered to be at high risk of bias, five at moderate risk and one at low risk. They were conducted in Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, New Zealand and the United States. All the studies were related to dental caries with only studies involving dental nurses and therapists meeting the inclusion criteria. No studies regarding cost effectiveness, irreversible diagnostic procedures or diseases other than caries were in included.

Conclusions: The authors concluded that the quality of the evidence was poor. They found that in select groups in which participants received irreversible dental treatment from teams that included midlevel providers, caries increment, caries severity or both decreased across time; however, there was no difference in caries increment, caries severity or both compared with those in populations in which dentists provided all irreversible treatment. In select groups in which participants had received irreversible dental treatment from teams that included midlevel providers, there was a decrease in untreated caries across time and a decrease in untreated caries compared with that in populations in which dentists provided all treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

LinkOut - more resources