Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2013 Aug;37(8):1619-20.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1969-3. Epub 2013 Jun 22.

Comment on Liu et al.: Operative versus non-operative treatment for clavicle fracture: a meta-analysis

Comment

Comment on Liu et al.: Operative versus non-operative treatment for clavicle fracture: a meta-analysis

Chenli Ye et al. Int Orthop. 2013 Aug.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Liu GD, Tong SL, Ou S, Zhou LS, Fei J, Nan GX, Gu JW. Operative versus non-operative treatment for clavicle fracture: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2013 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smekal V, Irenberger A, Struve P, Wambacher M, Krappinger D, Kralinger FS. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(2):106–112. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318190cf88. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith C, Rudd J, Crosby L (2001) Results of operative versus non-operative treatment for 100% displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a prospective randomized trial. In: Proceedings from the 68th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, San Francisco, CA
    1. Virtanen KJ, Paavola MP, Remes VM, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V, Bjorkenheim JM (2010) Nonoperative versus operative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures: a randomized controlled trial. The 75th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, San Francisco, CA, 9–12, pp 65–73

LinkOut - more resources