Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 28;3(5):e002598.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002598.

Doctors' willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Doctors' willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study

Alan F Merry et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to (1) evaluate the extent to which doctors in New Zealand would be willing to answer honestly questions about their care of patients at the end of their lives and (2) identify the assurances that would encourage this. Results were compared with findings from a previous pilot study from the UK.

Design: Survey study involving a mailed questionnaire.

Setting: New Zealand hospital and community-based medical care settings.

Participants: The questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of 800 doctors in New Zealand who were vocationally registered with the Medical Council of New Zealand in disciplines involving caring for patients at the end of their lives.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Willingness to provide honest answers about various aspects of end-of-life care; assurances that might increase willingness to provide honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices.

Results: Completed questionnaires were returned by 436 doctors. The majority of respondents (59.9-91.5%) indicated willingness to provide honest answers to such questions. However, more than a third of doctors were unwilling to give honest answers to certain questions regarding euthanasia. These results are comparable with the UK data. Complete anonymity was the assurance most likely to encourage honest answering, with most of the respondents preferring the use of anonymous written replies. Respondents were less reassured by survey endorsements from regulatory bodies. Themes in free comments included the deterrent effect of medicolegal consequences, fear of censure from society, peers and the media and concerns about the motivations and potential uses of such research.

Conclusions: Many New Zealand doctors were willing to give honest answers to questions about end-of-life practices, particularly if anonymity was guaranteed; others, however, expressed doubts or indicated that they would not be willing to provide honest answers to questions of this sort.

Keywords: Medical Ethics; Medical Law; Palliative Care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of percentage of respondents in New Zealand and the UK who would be willing to provide honest responses to questions about end-of-life practices.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Major reasons (as a percentage of all coded comments) cited by respondents to explain doctors’ reluctance in reporting end-of-life practices honestly.

References

    1. Draper H. Euthanasia. In: Chadwick R.ed Encyclopedia of applied ethics. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998:175–87
    1. Huxtable R, Campbell AV. Palliative care and the euthanasia debate: recent developments. Palliat Med 2003;17:94–6 - PubMed
    1. Huxtable R. Law, ethics and compromise at the limits of life: to treat or not to treat? Oxford: Routledge, 2012
    1. New Zealand Government Crimes act 1961. Wellington: New Zealand Government, 2012
    1. New Zealand Medical Association Position statement on euthanasia, 2005. http://www.nzma.org.nz/policies/advocacy/position-statements/euthanasia

LinkOut - more resources