Single dose oral ibuprofen plus paracetamol (acetaminophen) for acute postoperative pain
- PMID: 23794268
- PMCID: PMC6485825
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010210.pub2
Single dose oral ibuprofen plus paracetamol (acetaminophen) for acute postoperative pain
Abstract
Background: Combining two different analgesics in fixed doses in a single tablet can provide better pain relief than either drug alone in acute pain. This appears to be broadly true across a range of different drug combinations, in postoperative pain and migraine headache. Some combinations of ibuprofen and paracetamol are available for use without prescription in some acute pain situations.
Objectives: To assess the efficacy and adverse effects of single dose oral ibuprofen plus paracetamol for acute postoperative pain using methods that permit comparison with other analgesics evaluated in standardised trials using almost identical methods and outcomes.
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 4 of 12, 2013), MEDLINE (1950 to May 21st 2013), EMBASE (1974 to May 21st 2013), the Oxford Pain Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of articles.
Selection criteria: Randomised, double-blind clinical trials of single dose, oral ibuprofen plus paracetamol compared with placebo or the same dose of ibuprofen alone for acute postoperative pain in adults.
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently considered trials for inclusion in the review, assessed quality, and extracted data. We used validated equations to calculate the area under the pain relief versus time curve and derive the proportion of participants with at least 50% of maximum pain relief over six hours. We calculated relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat to benefit (NNT) for ibuprofen plus paracetamol, ibuprofen alone, or placebo. We used information on use of rescue medication to calculate the proportion of participants requiring rescue medication and the weighted mean of the median time to use. We also collected information on adverse events.
Main results: Searches identified three studies involving 1647 participants. Each of them examined several dose combinations. Included studies provided data from 508 participants for the comparison of ibuprofen 200 mg + paracetamol 500 mg with placebo, 543 participants for the comparison of ibuprofen 400 mg + paracetamol 1000 mg with placebo, and 359 participants for the comparison of ibuprofen 400 mg + paracetamol 1000 mg with ibuprofen 400 mg alone.The proportion of participants achieving at least 50% maximum pain relief over 6 hours was 69% with ibuprofen 200 mg + paracetamol 500 mg, 73% with ibuprofen 400 mg + paracetamol 1000 mg, and 7% with placebo, giving NNTs of 1.6 (1.5 to 1.8) and 1.5 (1.4 to 1.7) for the lower and higher doses respectively compared with placebo. For ibuprofen 400 mg alone the proportion was 52%, giving an NNT for ibuprofen 400 mg + paracetamol 1000 mg compared with ibuprofen alone of 5.4 (3.5 to 12).Ibuprofen + paracetamol at the 200/500 mg and 400/1000 mg doses resulted in longer times to remedication than placebo. The median time to use of rescue medication was 7.6 hours for ibuprofen 200 mg + paracetamol 500 mg, 8.3 hours with ibuprofen 400 mg + paracetamol 1000 mg, and 1.7 hours with placebo. Fewer participants needed rescue medication with ibuprofen + paracetamol combination than with placebo or ibuprofen alone. The proportion was 34% with ibuprofen 200 mg + paracetamol 500 mg, 25% with ibuprofen 400 mg + paracetamol 1000 mg, and 79% with placebo, giving NNTs to prevent use of rescue medication of 2.2 (1.8 to 2.9) and 1.8 (1.6 to 2.2) respectively compared with placebo. The proportion of participants using rescue medication with ibuprofen 400 mg was 48%, giving an NNT to prevent use for ibuprofen 400 mg + paracetamol 1000 mg compared with ibuprofen alone of 4.3 (3.0 to 7.7).The proportion of participants experiencing one or more adverse events was 30% with ibuprofen 200 mg + paracetamol 500 mg, 29% with ibuprofen 400 mg + paracetamol 1000 mg, and 48% with placebo, giving NNT values in favour of the combination treatment of 5.4 (3.6 to 10.5) and 5.1 (3.5 to 9.5) for the lower and higher doses respectively. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the included studies. Withdrawals for reasons other than lack of efficacy were fewer than 5% and balanced across treatment arms.
Authors' conclusions: Ibuprofen plus paracetamol combinations provided better analgesia than either drug alone (at the same dose), with a smaller chance of needing additional analgesia over about eight hours, and with a smaller chance of experiencing an adverse event.
Conflict of interest statement
RAM and SD have received research support from charities, government and industry sources at various times. RAM has consulted for various pharmaceutical companies and has received lecture fees from pharmaceutical companies related to analgesics and other healthcare interventions. CD has no interests to declare.
Figures















Update of
- doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010210
References
References to studies included in this review
Daniels 2011 {published data only}
-
- Daniels SE, Goulder MA, Aspley S, Reader S. A randomised, five‐parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of analgesic combinations including a novel single‐tablet combination of ibuprofen/paracetamol for postoperative dental pain. Pain 2011;152(3):632‐42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.012] - DOI - PubMed
Mehlisch 2010a {published and unpublished data}
-
- A double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo controlled randomized, single dose, two center, modified factorial design study comparing the analgesic efficacy of Advil® (400 mg ibuprofen), Tylenol® Extra Strength (1000 mg acetaminophen), the combination of Advil (400 mg ibuprofen) and Tylenol Extra Strength (1000 mg acetaminophen), and the combination of Advil (200 mg ibuprofen) and Tylenol Extra Strength (500 mg acetaminophen) in patients experiencing postoperative dental pain. Supplied as full clinical trial report by Reckitt Benckiser.
-
- Mehlisch DR, Aspley S, Daniels SE, Bandy DP. Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of concurrent ibuprofen and paracetamol with ibuprofen or paracetamol alone in the management of moderate to severe acute postoperative dental pain in adolescents and adults: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, single‐dose, two‐center, modified factorial study. Clinical Therapeutics 2010;32(5):882‐895. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.022] - DOI - PubMed
Mehlisch 2010b {published and unpublished data}
-
- A double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled, randomized, single and multiple‐dose phase, multi‐center factorial design, two‐part study examining the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of three fixed‐dose combinations of ibuprofen plus acetaminophen (ibuprofen 100 mg plus acetaminophen 250 mg, ibuprofen 200 mg plus acetaminophen 500 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg plus acetaminophen 1000 mg), ibuprofen alone (200 mg and 400 mg), and acetaminophen alone (500 mg and 1000 mg) in adult dental pain following third molar extraction. Supplied as full clinical trial report by Reckitt Benckiser.
-
- Mehlisch DR, Aspley S, Daniels SE, Southerden KA, Christensen KS. A single‐tablet fixed‐dose combination of racemic ibuprofen/paracetamol in the management of moderate to severe postoperative dental pain in adult and adolescent patients: a multicenter, two‐stage, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled, factorial study. Clinical Therapeutics 2010;32(6):1033‐49. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.06.002] - DOI - PubMed
References to studies excluded from this review
Menhinick 2004 {published data only}
-
- Menhinick KA, Gutmann JL, Regan JD, Taylor SE, Buschang PH. The efficacy of pain control following nonsurgical root canal treatment using ibuprofen or a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. International Endodontic Journal 2004;37:531–41. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00836.x] - DOI - PubMed
Merry 2010 {published data only}
Mitchell 2008 {published data only}
-
- Mitchell A, Zanten SV, Inglis K, Porter G. A randomized controlled trial comparing acetaminophen plus ibuprofen versus acetaminophen plus codeine plus caffeine after outpatient general surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2008;206:472–9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.09.006] - DOI - PubMed
Naidu 1994 {published data only}
-
- Naidu MU, Kumar TR, Jagdishchandra US, Babu PA, Rao MM, Babhulkar SS, et al. Evaluation of ketorolac, ibuprofen‐paracetamol, and dextropropoxyphene‐paracetamol in postoperative pain. Pharmacotherapy 1994;14(2):173‐7. - PubMed
References to ongoing studies
NCT00921700 {unpublished data only}
-
- Skoglund LA (Study Director). Analgesic Effect of Paracetamol, Paracetamol + Codeine, Ibuprofen and Their Combination. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00921700?term=ibuprofen+AND+paracetam... [accessed 11 October 2012].
NCT01559259 {unpublished data only}
-
- Pfizer. Evaluation of the efficacy of novel ibuprofen acetaminophen combination formulations in the treatment of post‐surgical dental pain. www.http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01559259?term=ibuprofen+AND+paracetamol&a... [accessed 11 October 2012].
Additional references
Barden 2004
Botting 2000
Chandrasekharan 2002
-
- Chandrasekharan NV, Dai H, Roos KL, Evanson NK, Tomsik J, Elton TS, et al. COX‐3, a cyclooxygenase‐1 variant inhibited by acetaminophen and other analgesic/antipyretic drugs: cloning, structure, and expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002;99(21):13926‐31. [DOI: 10.1073/pnas.162468699] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Chaparro 2012
Clarke 2012
Collins 1997
Collins 2001
Cook 1995
Cooper 1991
-
- Cooper SA. Single‐dose analgesic studies: the upside and downside of assay sensitivity. In: Max MB, Portenoy RK, Laska EM editor(s). The Design of Analgesic Clinical Trials. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. Vol. 18, New York: Raven Press, 1991:117‐24.
CSM 1997
-
- Committee on Safety of Medicines. Medicines Control Agency. Paracetamol and aspirin. Current problems in Pharmacovigilance 1997;23:9.
Dart 2000
-
- Dart RC, Kuffner EK, Rumack BH. Treatment of pain or fever with paracetamol (acetaminophen) in the alcoholic patient: a systematic review. The American Journal of Therapeutics 2000;7(2):123‐34. - PubMed
Derry 2009
Derry 2010
FDA 2011
-
- FDA Drug Safety Communication: Prescription Acetaminophen Products to be Limited to 325 mg Per Dosage Unit; Boxed Warning Will Highlight Potential for Severe Liver Failure, 2011. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm239821.htm [accessed 6 Aug 2012].
FitzGerald 2001
Flower 1972
-
- Flower JR, Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthetase in brain explains the anti‐pyretic activity of paracetamol (4‐acetamidophenol). Nature 1972;240:410‐1. - PubMed
Forrest 2002
Gaskell 2009
Graham 2005
-
- Graham GG, Scott KF. Mechanism of action of paracetamol. American Journal of Therapeutics 2005;12(1):46‐55. - PubMed
Gunnell 1997
Hawkins 2007
-
- Hawkins LC, Edwards JN, Dargan PI. Impact of restricting paracetamol pack sizes on paracetamol poisoning in the United Kingdom: a review of the literature. Drug Safety 2007;30(6):465‐79. - PubMed
Hawton 2001
Hernandez‐Diaz 2001
Higgins 2011
-
- Altman DG, Antes G, Gøtzsche P, Higgins JPT, Jüni P, Lewis S, et al. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. www.cochrane‐handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Hinz 2008
Hinz 2012
Jadad 1996a
Jadad 1996b
L'Abbé 1987
-
- L'Abbé KA, Detsky AS, O'Rourke K. Meta‐analysis in clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987;107:224‐33. - PubMed
McQuay 2005
Moher 1999
Moore 1996
Moore 1997a
Moore 1997b
Moore 1998
Moore 2003
-
- Moore RA, Edwards J, Barden J, McQuay HJ. Bandolier's Little Book of Pain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. [ISBN: 0‐19‐263247‐7]
Moore 2005
Moore 2006
-
- Moore A, McQuay H. Bandolier's Little Book of Making Sense of the Medical Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. [ISBN: 0‐19‐856604‐2]
Moore 2008
-
- Moore RA, Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Managing potential publication bias. In: McQuay HJ, Kalso E, Moore RA editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Pain Research: Methodology Refined. Seattle: IASP Press, 2008:15‐23. [ISBN: 978‐0‐931092‐69‐5]
Moore 2011a
Moore 2011b
-
- Moore RA, Straube S, Paine J, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Minimum efficacy criteria for comparisons between treatments using individual patient meta‐analysis of acute pain trials: examples of etoricoxib, paracetamol, ibuprofen, and ibuprofen/paracetamol combinations after third molar extraction. Pain 2011;152(5):982‐9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.030] - DOI - PubMed
Moore 2012
Morris 1995
Norris 2008
Nuesch 2010
PIC 2008
-
- Paracetamol Information Centre. www.pharmweb.net [accessed 6 Aug 2012].
Prescott 2000
-
- Prescott LF. Therapeutic misadventure with paracetamol: fact or fiction?. American Journal of Therapeutics 2000;7(2):99‐114. - PubMed
Rapoport 1999
-
- Rapoport RJ. The safety of NSAIDs and related drugs for the management of acute pain: maximizing benefits and minimizing risks. Cancer Control 1999;6(2 Suppl 1):18‐21. - PubMed
RevMan 2011 [Computer program]
-
- The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Schwab 2003
-
- Schwab JM, Schluesener HJ, Laufer S. COX‐3: just another COX or the solitary elusive target of paracetamol?. The Lancet 2003;361:981‐2. - PubMed
Toms 2008
Toms 2009
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical