Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;71(3):1312-23.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.24773.

Analysis and correction of gradient nonlinearity bias in apparent diffusion coefficient measurements

Affiliations

Analysis and correction of gradient nonlinearity bias in apparent diffusion coefficient measurements

Dariya I Malyarenko et al. Magn Reson Med. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Gradient nonlinearity of MRI systems leads to spatially dependent b-values and consequently high non-uniformity errors (10-20%) in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements over clinically relevant field-of-views. This work seeks practical correction procedure that effectively reduces observed ADC bias for media of arbitrary anisotropy in the fewest measurements.

Methods: All-inclusive bias analysis considers spatial and time-domain cross-terms for diffusion and imaging gradients. The proposed correction is based on rotation of the gradient nonlinearity tensor into the diffusion gradient frame where spatial bias of b-matrix can be approximated by its Euclidean norm. Correction efficiency of the proposed procedure is numerically evaluated for a range of model diffusion tensor anisotropies and orientations.

Results: Spatial dependence of nonlinearity correction terms accounts for the bulk (75-95%) of ADC bias for FA = 0.3-0.9. Residual ADC non-uniformity errors are amplified for anisotropic diffusion. This approximation obviates need for full diffusion tensor measurement and diagonalization to derive a corrected ADC. Practical scenarios are outlined for implementation of the correction on clinical MRI systems.

Conclusions: The proposed simplified correction algorithm appears sufficient to control ADC non-uniformity errors in clinical studies using three orthogonal diffusion measurements. The most efficient reduction of ADC bias for anisotropic medium is achieved with non-lab-based diffusion gradients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of proposed ADC correction workflow. Dashed outline marks one-time procedure to obtain corrector maps for a specific MRI scanner. This is followed by description of allowed correction routes for a DWI scan to remove ADC bias.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of gradient nonlinearity on spatial non-uniformity of diagonal (a–c) versus off-diagonal (d–f) elements of b-matrix over FOV = 300×300×300mm is illustrated for DWI gradients along “Z”-LAB (a,d), “Z”-OVP (b,e), and corrected “Z”-OVP (c,f). Spatial dependence is represented by color gradient at boundary planes (X=150mm, Y=150mm, Z=−150mm) and spherical slice through the FOV. Color-bars to the right of each 3D-map provide the scale for depicted b-values (s/mm2). The unbiased (uniform) b-value corresponds to 1010 (a), 755 (b) and 1510s/mm2 (c) at isocenter. The deviation from uniformity is visually estimated by the color gradient scale away from isocenter. The color gradient of the corrected map (c) preserves all spatial non-uniformity information of (b) to remove nonlinearity bias via Eqs.[4,5]. The residual non-uniformity error, Eq.[2], of b-matrix is represented by the spatial bias and relative scale of the off-diagonal b-elements (d–f).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of measured spatial bias for ADC (a,b) for isotropic ice-water phantom) to the model (c,d) in case of LAB-DWI gradients plotted for three separate directions (dashed, dotted curves) and the trace (solid curve): (a,c) SI offset; (b,d) LR offset. Dotted horizontal lines mark 5% deviations from reported ADC ≡ 1.1×10−3mm2/s value of water (36) at 0 °C (solid line). Error bars for the measured trace ADC correspond to a standard deviation over 10 mm diameter circular ROI (approx. 90 pixels). Spatial non-uniformity bias away from isocenter exceeded experimental measurement errors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Corrected versus uncorrected ADC gray-scale maps for 60 image slices (6×10 tiles) through FOV = 300×300×300 mm3 for (a) isotropic media FA=0 and (b) an arbitrary diffusion-tensor orientation with FA=0.9. Gray color-bar scale is 10−3 mm2/s. ADC non-uniformity bias is depicted by deviation from true (uniform model) ADC ≡ 1×10−3mm2/s across FOV.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) corrected (dark) versus uncorrected (light grey) error histograms (scaled to maximum pixel number) for four FAs and 2510 uniform diffusion-tensor orientations within FOV = 300×300×300mm; (b) total correction efficiency (%RMSE) as a function of FA for all pixels within FOV averaged over 2510 diffusion tensor orientations for LAB (gray circles) versus OVP (black circles) DWI. Squares illustrate baseline efficiency without bias correction.

References

    1. Clark CA, Le Bihan D. Water diffusion compartmentation and anisotropy at high b values in the human brain. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44(6):852–859. - PubMed
    1. Galban CJ, Mukherji SK, Chenevert TL, Meyer CR, Hamstra DA, Bland PH, Johnson TD, Moffat BA, Rehemtulla A, Eisbruch A, Ross BD. A feasibility study of parametric response map analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans of head and neck cancer patients for providing early detection of therapeutic efficacy. Transl Oncol. 2009;2(3):184–190. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sorensen AG, Buonanno FS, Gonzalez RG, Schwamm LH, Lev MH, Huang-Hellinger FR, Reese TG, Weisskoff RM, Davis TL, Suwanwela N, Can U, Moreira JA, Copen WA, Look RB, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR, Koroshetz WJ. Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology. 1996;199(2):391–401. - PubMed
    1. Chenevert TL, Stegman LD, Taylor JM, Robertson PL, Greenberg HS, Rehemtulla A, Ross BD. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(24):2029–2036. - PubMed
    1. Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, Barentsz JO, Carey B, Futterer JJ, Heijmink SW, Hoskin PJ, Kirkham A, Padhani AR, Persad R, Puech P, Punwani S, Sohaib AS, Tombal B, Villers A, van der Meulen J, Emberton M. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. Eur Urol. 2011;59(4):477–494. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms