Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep 1;66(3):477-492.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01657.x.

"What did you say, and who do you think you are?" How Power Differences Affect Emotional Reactions to Prejudice

Manuela Barreto  1 , Naomi Ellemers, Susan T Fiske
Affiliations

"What did you say, and who do you think you are?" How Power Differences Affect Emotional Reactions to Prejudice

Manuela Barreto et al. J Soc Issues. .

Abstract

Three studies examine how power differences between targets and sources of prejudice affect targets' emotional reactions to prejudice. Study 1 first demonstrates that people do not expect powerful others to be prejudiced. Studies 2 and 3 then examine what happens when targets encounter prejudice, as a function of the source's power. Targets notice and recall prejudiced statements from powerful sources, irrespective of whether or not they are personally dependent on the source. However, results also demonstrate that personal dependency on the source determines how much targets attend to and are emotionally affected by prejudice. Emotional reactions to prejudice as a function of source power were mediated by negative expectations about future interactions.

Keywords: discrimination; prejudice; sexism; social power; social stigma; targets of discrimination.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson C, Berdhal JL. The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;83:1362–1377. - PubMed
    1. Ashburn-Nardo L. The importance of implicit and explicit measures for understanding social stigma. Journal of Social Issues. (in press)
    1. Baron RH, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistic considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Barreto M, Ellemers N. The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2005;35:633–642.
    1. Barreto M, Ellemers N, Cihangir S, Stroebe K. The self-fulfilling effects of contemporary sexism: How the well-being and behaviour of women is affected by the subtle discrimination they encounter. In: Barreto M, Ryan M, Schmitt S, editors. The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. American Psychological Association; 2009.

LinkOut - more resources