Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;4(1):95-101.
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1060. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

The effect direction plot: visual display of non-standardised effects across multiple outcome domains

Affiliations
Free PMC article

The effect direction plot: visual display of non-standardised effects across multiple outcome domains

Hilary J Thomson et al. Res Synth Methods. 2013 Mar.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Visual display of reported impacts is a valuable aid to both reviewers and readers of systematic reviews. Forest plots are routinely prepared to report standardised effect sizes, but where standardised effect sizes are not available for all included studies a forest plot may misrepresent the available evidence. Tabulated data summaries to accompany the narrative synthesis can be lengthy and inaccessible. Moreover, the link between the data and the synthesis conclusions may be opaque. This paper details the preparation of visual summaries of effect direction for multiple outcomes across 29 quantitative studies of the health impacts of housing improvement. A one page summary of reported health outcomes was prepared to accompany a 10 000-word narrative synthesis. The one page summary included details of study design, internal validity, sample size, time of follow-up, as well as changes in intermediate outcomes, for example, housing condition. This approach to visually summarising complex data can aid the reviewer in cross-study analysis and improve accessibility and transparency of the narrative synthesis where standardised effect sizes are not available. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords: data tabulation; multiple outcomes; narrative synthesis; non-statistical heterogeneity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson LM, Petticrew M, Rehfuess E, Armstrong R, Ueffing E, Baker P, Francis D, Tugwell P. Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews. Res Synth Meth. 2011;2:33–42. - PubMed
    1. Cohen IB. Florence nightingale. Sci Am. 1984;250:128–37. - PubMed
    1. Doyle J, Armstrong R, Waters E. Issues raised in systematic reviews of complex multisectoral and community based interventions. J Public Health. 2008;30:213–215. - PubMed
    1. Jackson N, Waters E, Guidelines T, for Systematic Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health Interventions Taskforce The challenges of systematically reviewing public health interventions. J Public Health. 2004;26:303–307. - PubMed
    1. Lucas PJ, Baird J, Arai L, Law C, Roberts HM. Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:4. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources