Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;23(3):247-60.

Pediatric flexible flatfoot; clinical aspects and algorithmic approach

Affiliations

Pediatric flexible flatfoot; clinical aspects and algorithmic approach

Farzin Halabchi et al. Iran J Pediatr. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Flatfoot constitutes the major cause of clinic visits for pediatric foot problems. The reported prevalence of flatfoot varies widely due to numerous factors. It can be divided into flexible and rigid flatfoot. Diagnosis and management of pediatric flatfoot has long been the matter of controversy. Common assessment tools include visual inspection, anthropometric values, footprint parameters and radiographic evaluation. Most flexible flatfeet are physiologic, asymptomatic, and require no treatment. Otherwise, the physician should treat symptomatic flexible flatfeet. Initial treatment options include activity modification, proper shoe and orthoses, exercises and medication. Furthermore, comorbidities such as obesity and ligamenous laxity should be identified and managed, if applicable. When all nonsurgical treatment options faile, surgery can be considered. Our purpose in this article is to present a clinical algorithmic approach to pediatric flatfoot.

Keywords: Algorithm; Children; Exercise; Flatfoot; Hyperpronation; Orthosis; Pes planus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Footprint analysis, a)Arch index, A-forefoof, B-midfoot, C-hindfoot, L- length of the foot. Arch index= B/A + B+C; b)Chippaux-Smirak index= B/A × 100% c) Staheli arch index= B/C × 100%
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Lateral radiograph of foot TM, talo-first metatarsal angle; TH, talo-horizontal angle; TC, talocalcaneal angle; CA, calcaneal inclination angle
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Diagnostic algorithm for pediatric flatfoot
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Algorithmic approach to pediatric flatfoot

References

    1. Fabry G. Clinical practice. Static, axial, and rotational deformities of the lower extremities in children. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(5):529–34. - PubMed
    1. Evans AM, Rome K, Peet L. The foot posture index, ankle lunge test, Beighton scale and the lower limb assessment score in healthy children: a reliability study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2012;5(1):1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krul M, van der Wouden JC, Schellevis FG, et al. Foot problems in children presented to the family physician: a comparison between 1987 and 2001. Fam Pract. 2009;26(3):174–9. - PubMed
    1. Lin CJ, Lai KA, Kuan TS, et al. Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(3):378–82. - PubMed
    1. Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, et al. Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2):634–9. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources