Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: is the centre better? The case against centralisation of ERCP services
- PMID: 23795285
- PMCID: PMC3686311
- DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2012-100182
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: is the centre better? The case against centralisation of ERCP services
Abstract
More than 48 000 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCP) are performed in the UK per annum; the majority within district general hospitals. The proposal for centralisation of ERCP services is based on evidence that technical success, length of stay and complication rates are related to the numbers of procedures performed. Local units wishing to continue their ERCP practice, must demonstrate that they are performing sufficient numbers of procedures in a safe, timely and competent fashion.
Keywords: Biliary Endoscopy; Diagnostic And Therapeutic Endoscopy; Endoscopic Retrograde Pancreatography.
References
-
- NCEPOD. Scoping our practice; The 2004 Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. London: NCEPOD, 2004. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2004.htm (accessed).
-
- Bodger K, Bowering K, Sarkar S, et al. All-cause mortality after first ERCP in England: clinically guided analysis of hospital episode statistics with linkage to registrar of death. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:825–33. - PubMed
-
- Barrison IG, Bramble MG, Wilkinson M, et al. Provision of endoscopy related services in district general hospitals. Working party report of the British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Committee 2001. http://www.bsg.org.uk/images/stories/docs/clinical/guidelines/endoscopy/... (accessed May 2012).
-
- Green JRB, the UK ERCP Stakeholders Working Party. 2007. http://www.bsg.org.uk/pdf_word_docs/ercp_stakeholders_08.doc (accessed May 2012).
-
- Chatterjee S, Rees C, Dwarakanath AD, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography practice in district general hospitals in North East England: a Northern Regional Endoscopy Group (NREG) study. J R Coll Physicans Edinb 2011;41:109–13. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources