Evaluation of small intestine grafts decellularization methods for corneal tissue engineering

Abstract

Advances in the development of cornea substitutes by tissue engineering techniques have focused on the use of decellularized tissue scaffolds. In this work, we evaluated different chemical and physical decellularization methods on small intestine tissues to determine the most appropriate decellularization protocols for corneal applications. Our results revealed that the most efficient decellularization agents were the SDS and triton X-100 detergents, which were able to efficiently remove most cell nuclei and residual DNA. Histological and histochemical analyses revealed that collagen fibers were preserved upon decellularization with triton X-100, NaCl and sonication, whereas reticular fibers were properly preserved by decellularization with UV exposure. Extracellular matrix glycoproteins were preserved after decellularization with SDS, triton X-100 and sonication, whereas proteoglycans were not affected by any of the decellularization protocols. Tissue transparency was significantly higher than control non-decellularized tissues for all protocols, although the best light transmittance results were found in tissues decellularized with SDS and triton X-100. In conclusion, our results suggest that decellularized intestinal grafts could be used as biological scaffolds for cornea tissue engineering. Decellularization with triton X-100 was able to efficiently remove all cells from the tissues while preserving tissue structure and most fibrillar and non-fibrillar extracellular matrix components, suggesting that this specific decellularization agent could be safely used for efficient decellularization of SI tissues for cornea TE applications.

Figure 1. Histograms representing the efficiency of cell removal and tissue structure preservation as determined by DAPI (A), residual DNA quantification (B), picrosirius collagen staining (C), Gomori reticulin (D), PAS glycoprotein staining (E) and alcian blue proteoglycan staining (F).

Bars correspond to average values ± standard deviations.

Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of control SI samples (A), and tissues decellularized with 1.5 M NaCl (B), 3 M NaCl (C), 5 M NaCl (D), 0.1% SDS (E), 0.3% SDS (F), 0.6% SDS (G), 0.1% triton X-100 (H), 0.3% triton X-100 (I), 0.6% triton X-100 (J), 10 min SC (K), 20 min SC (L), 30 min SC (M), 10 min UV (N), 20 min UV (O) and 30 min UV (P).

Scale bar represents 50 µm.

Figure 3. Picrosirius collagen fibers staining of control SI samples (A), and tissues decellularized with 1.5 M NaCl (B), 3 M NaCl (C), 5 M NaCl (D), 0.1% SDS (E), 0.3% SDS (F), 0.6% SDS (G), 0.1% triton X-100 (H), 0.3% triton X-100 (I), 0.6% triton X-100 (J), 10 min SC (K), 20 min SC (L), 30 min SC (M), 10 min UV (N), 20 min UV (O) and 30 min UV (P).

All scale bars represent 200 µm, with exception of the insert representing a higher magnification image (scale bar = 800 µm).

Figure 4. Gomori reticulin staining of control SI samples (A), and tissues decellularized with 1.5 M NaCl (B), 3 M NaCl (C), 5 M NaCl (D), 0.1% SDS (E), 0.3% SDS (F), 0.6% SDS (G), 0.1% triton X-100 (H), 0.3% triton X-100 (I), 0.6% triton X-100 (J), 10 min SC (K), 20 min SC (L), 30 min SC (M), 10 min UV (N), 20 min UV (O) and 30 min UV (P).

All scale bars represent 200 µm, with exception of the insert representing a higher magnification image (scale bar = 800 µm).

Figure 5. PAS glycoprotein staining of control SI samples (A), and tissues decellularized with 1.5 M NaCl (B), 3 M NaCl (C), 5 M NaCl (D), 0.1% SDS (E), 0.3% SDS (F), 0.6% SDS (G), 0.1% triton X-100 (H), 0.3% triton X-100 (I), 0.6% triton X-100 (J), 10 min SC (K), 20 min SC (L), 30 min SC (M), 10 min UV (N), 20 min UV (O) and 30 min UV (P).

All scale bars represent 200 µm, with exception of the insert representing a higher magnification image (scale bar = 800 µm).

Figure 6. Alcian blue proteoglycan staining of control SI samples (A), and tissues decellularized with 1.5 M NaCl (B), 3 M NaCl (C), 5 M NaCl (D), 0.1% SDS (E), 0.3% SDS (F), 0.6% SDS (G), 0.1% triton X-100 (H), 0.3% triton X-100 (I), 0.6% triton X-100 (J), 10 min SC (K), 20 min SC (L), 30 min SC (M), 10 min UV (N), 20 min UV (O) and 30 min UV (P).

All scale bars represent 200 µm, with exception of the insert representing a higher magnification image (scale bar = 800 µm).

Figure 7. Photographic images of control and decellularized SI samples using a patterned surface to estimate transparency.

Images correspond to control SI samples (A), and tissues decellularized with 1.5 M NaCl (B), 3 M NaCl (C), 5 M NaCl (D), 0.1% SDS (E), 0.3% SDS (F), 0.6% SDS (G), 0.1% triton X-100 (H), 0.3% triton X-100 (I), 0.6% triton X-100 (J), 10 min SC (K), 20 min SC (L), 30 min SC (M), 10 min UV (N), 20 min UV (O) and 30 min UV (P).

Figure 8. Light transmittance analysis of control and decellularized SI samples.

Panel A corresponds to samples decellularized using chemical agents, whereas results of the application of physical decellularization methods are shown in panel B. Non-decellularized intestine and native porcine cornea are shown as controls.