Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun 22:2:43.
doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-43.

Health equity: evidence synthesis and knowledge translation methods

Vivian A Welch  1 , Mark Petticrew, Jennifer O'Neill, Elizabeth Waters, Rebecca Armstrong, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Damian Francis, Tracey Perez Koehlmoos, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Tomas Pantoja, Peter Tugwell
Affiliations

Health equity: evidence synthesis and knowledge translation methods

Vivian A Welch et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: At the Rio Summit in 2011 on Social Determinants of Health, the global community recognized a pressing need to take action on reducing health inequities. This requires an improved evidence base on the effects of national and international policies on health inequities. Although systematic reviews are recognized as an important source for evidence-informed policy, they have been criticized for failing to assess effects on health equity.

Methods: This article summarizes guidance on both conducting systematic reviews with a focus on health equity and on methods to translate their findings to different audiences. This guidance was developed based on a series of methodology meetings, previous guidance, a recently developed reporting guideline for equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-Equity 2012) and a systematic review of methods to assess health equity in systematic reviews.

Results: We make ten recommendations for conducting equity-focused systematic reviews; and five considerations for knowledge translation. Illustrative examples of equity-focused reviews are provided where these methods have been used.

Conclusions: Implementation of the recommendations in this article is one step toward monitoring the impact of national and international policies and programs on health equity, as recommended by the 2011 World Conference on Social Determinants of Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example analytic framework. Source: Welch, 2013 [30].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization: Summary Report. World Conference on Social Determinants of Health. 2012. http://www.who.int/sdhconference/resources/Conference_Summary_Report.pdf.
    1. Bosch-Capblanch X, Lavis JN, Lewin S, Atun R, Røttingen J-A. et al. Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: rationale for and challenges of guidance development. PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001185. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milton B, Moonan M, Taylor-Robinson D, Whitehead M. How can the health equity impact assessment of universal policies be evaluated? Insights into approaches and next steps. Europe: Regional Office for World Health Organization; 2010.
    1. Tugwell P, de Savigny D, Hawker G, Robinson V. Applying clinical epidemiological methods to health equity: the equity effectiveness loop. Br Med J. 2006;332:358–361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7537.358. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petticrew M, Tugwell P, Kristjansson E, Oliver S, Ueffing E, Welch V. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t: subgroup analysis and equity. Community Health: J Epidemiol; 2011. - PubMed

Publication types