Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 1):1996-2013.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12076. Epub 2013 Jun 26.

Plan-provider integration, premiums, and quality in the Medicare Advantage market

Affiliations

Plan-provider integration, premiums, and quality in the Medicare Advantage market

Austin B Frakt et al. Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate how integration between Medicare Advantage plans and health care providers is related to plan premiums and quality ratings.

Data source: We used public data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Area Resource File and private data from one large insurer. Premiums and quality ratings are from 2009 CMS administrative files and some control variables are historical.

Study design: We estimated ordinary least-squares models for premiums and plan quality ratings, with state fixed effects and firm random effects. The key independent variable was an indicator of plan-provider integration.

Data collection: With the exception of Medigap premium data, all data were publicly available. We ascertained plan-provider integration through examination of plans' websites and governance documents.

Principal findings: We found that integrated plan-providers charge higher premiums, controlling for quality. Such plans also have higher quality ratings. We found no evidence that integration is associated with more generous benefits.

Conclusions: Current policy encourages plan-provider integration, although potential effects on health insurance products and markets are uncertain. Policy makers and regulators may want to closely monitor changes in premiums and quality after integration and consider whether quality improvement (if any) justifies premium increases (if they occur).

Keywords: Medicare; health care; health economics; industrial organization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Baranes E, Bardey D. Competition in Health Care Markets and Vertical Restraints. Montpellier, France: Cahiers de Recherche du LASER 013-03-04, Laboratoire de Sciences É conomiques de Richter (LASER), Université de Montpellier; 2004.
    1. Beaulieu N. “Quality Information and Consumer Health Plan Choices”. Journal of Health Economics. 2002;21:43–63. - PubMed
    1. Bijlsma M, Boone J, Zwart G. Selective Contracting and Foreclosure in Health Care Markets. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University; 2009.
    1. Capps C, Dranove D, Greenstein S, Satterthwaite M. Antitrust Policy and Hospital Mergers: Recommendations for a New Approach. 2002. [accessed June 6, 2013]. Available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.jo...
    1. Carlton DW, Perloff JM. Modern Industrial Organization. New York: HarperCollins Publishers; 1990.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources