Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jun 26:13:173.
doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-173.

Effectiveness of structured patient-clinician communication with a solution focused approach (DIALOG+) in community treatment of patients with psychosis--a cluster randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of structured patient-clinician communication with a solution focused approach (DIALOG+) in community treatment of patients with psychosis--a cluster randomised controlled trial

Stefan Priebe et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Large numbers of patients with psychosis have regular meetings with key clinicians in the community. There is little evidence on how these meetings should be conducted to be therapeutically effective. DIALOG, a computer mediated procedure, was shown to improve outcomes in a European multi-centre trial. DIALOG structures the patient-clinician communication and makes it patient-centred, but does not guide clinicians as to how to respond to patients' concerns. DIALOG has been further developed into DIALOG+, which uses advanced software and, additionally, provides a four step approach--based on a solution focused model--for addressing patients' concerns. We designed a cluster randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of DIALOG+ in improving treatment outcomes of patients with psychosis in the community.

Methods/design: Key workers are recruited from community mental health teams in East London and randomly allocated to either the intervention or control group. Out of their case loads, we identify patients with schizophrenia (F 20-29) and a moderate or lower level of subjective quality of life (MANSA score <5), who are treated according to the allocation of their key workers. Key workers in the intervention group are trained in using DIALOG+ and use it with each patient over a six-month period. Control patients rate their satisfaction with life and treatment on a tablet to control for the effect of regular ratings and the use of modern technology. We are recruiting up to 42 key workers to reach a total sample size of 180 patients. Clinical and social outcomes including costs are assessed after 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome is subjective quality-of-life at 6 months.

Discussion: The trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intervention (DIALOG+) which uses modern technology to support routine patient-clinician meetings in community care, makes the communication patient centred and guides patients and clinicians to address concerns. DIALOG+ is a generic and widely applicable intervention. If shown as effective, it can be used to improve outcomes of community care on a large scale, ensuring that routine encounters are therapeutically effective. DIALOG+ can also be implemented across services at relatively low additional costs.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN34757603.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lloyd T, Kennedy N, Fearon P, Kirkbride J, Mallett R, Leff J. et al.Incidence of bipolar affective disorder in three UK cities: results from the AESOP study. Brit J Psychiat. 2005;186:126–131. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.2.126. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gupta RD, Guest JF. Annual cost of bipolar disorder to UK society. Brit J Psychiat. 2002;180:227–233. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.3.227. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of newer atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia. TA43. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2002.
    1. Klinkenberg WD, Calsyn RJ, Morse GA. The helping alliance in case management for homeless persons with severe mental illness. Community Ment Hlt J. 1998;34:569–578. doi: 10.1023/A:1018758917277. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCabe R, Priebe S. The therapeutic relationship in the treatment of severe mental illness: a review of methods and findings. Int J Soc Psychiatr. 2004;50:115–128. doi: 10.1177/0020764004040959. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data