Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun 26;9(4):20130492.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0492. Print 2013 Aug 23.

Assessing the exposure risk and impacts of pharmaceuticals in the environment on individuals and ecosystems

Affiliations

Assessing the exposure risk and impacts of pharmaceuticals in the environment on individuals and ecosystems

Kathryn E Arnold et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

The use of human and veterinary pharmaceuticals is increasing. Over the past decade, there has been a proliferation of research into potential environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals in the environment. A Royal Society-supported seminar brought together experts from diverse scientific fields to discuss the risks posed by pharmaceuticals to wildlife. Recent analytical advances have revealed that pharmaceuticals are entering habitats via water, sewage, manure and animal carcases, and dispersing through food chains. Pharmaceuticals are designed to alter physiology at low doses and so can be particularly potent contaminants. The near extinction of Asian vultures following exposure to diclofenac is the key example where exposure to a pharmaceutical caused a population-level impact on non-target wildlife. However, more subtle changes to behaviour and physiology are rarely studied and poorly understood. Grand challenges for the future include developing more realistic exposure assessments for wildlife, assessing the impacts of mixtures of pharmaceuticals in combination with other environmental stressors and estimating the risks from pharmaceutical manufacturing and usage in developing countries. We concluded that an integration of diverse approaches is required to predict 'unexpected' risks; specifically, ecologically relevant, often long-term and non-lethal, consequences of pharmaceuticals in the environment for wildlife and ecosystems.

Keywords: bioindicators; endocrine-disrupting chemicals; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; risk prediction; vultures; wildlife.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. MEA 2005. Millenium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press
    1. Boxall ABA. 2009. Assessing environmental effects of human pharmaceuticals. Toxicol. Lett. 189, S33.10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.065 (doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.065) - DOI - DOI
    1. Sumpter JP. 2009. Protecting aquatic organisms from chemicals: the harsh realities. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 3877–389410.1098/rsta.2009.0106 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2009.0106) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Celander MC, Goldstone JV, Denslow ND, Iguchi T, Kille P, Meyerhoff RD, Smith BA, Hutchinson TH, Wheeler JR. 2011. Species extrapolation for the 21st century. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 30, 52–6310.1002/etc.382 (doi:10.1002/etc.382) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jobling S, et al. 2006. Predicted exposures to steroid estrogens in UK rivers correlate with widespread sexual disruption in wild fish populations. Environ. Health Perspect. 114, 32–3910.1289/ehp.8050 (doi:10.1289/ehp.8050) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances