Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;111(1):51-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.04.015. Epub 2013 May 22.

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy given by subcutaneous rapid push vs infusion pump: a retrospective analysis

Affiliations

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy given by subcutaneous rapid push vs infusion pump: a retrospective analysis

Ralph S Shapiro. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Administration of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) via rapid push, an alternative to infusion pump delivery, can offer heightened simplicity and convenience for patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PIDD).

Objective: To assess dosing and administration patterns, serum IgG responses, safety, and tolerability of the subcutaneous (SC) rapid push technique.

Methods: A retrospective medical record review captured data on 173 patients with PIDD (1,140 follow-up visits) who self-administered SCIG (16% or 20%) via infusion pump or SC rapid push.

Results: Serum IgG levels increased from a mean (SD) trough of 903.8 (285.4) mg/dL during intravenous immunoglobulin use to a steady-state mean (SD) of 1,121.6 (257.6) mg/dL on SCIG. Mean frequency of weekly SCIG administration was 2.3 days per week with pump and 2.8 days per week with SC rapid push. Mean serum IgG levels were higher among push vs pump users (1,164 vs 1,048 mg/dL). Mean (SD) SCIG volume administered per infusion site with SC rapid push was 15.0 (7.3) mL (maximum, 60.0 mL). Most patients using SC rapid push infused in 9 minutes or less; median pump infusion duration was 49 minutes. Use of 20% SCIG was associated with smaller mean weekly product volumes vs 16% SCIG (41.7 vs 51.0 mL) and fewer mean dosing days per week (2.0 vs 2.8 days). Adverse events, primarily local, were reported on fewer visits with SC rapid push (15.6%) than with infusion pump (20.7%).

Conclusion: The SC rapid push technique is a safe, viable alternative to an infusion pump, seemingly preferred by patients and offering more rapid administration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances