Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jul;132(1):165-171.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182910acb.

Prospective analysis of presurgical risk factors for outcomes in primary palatoplasty

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prospective analysis of presurgical risk factors for outcomes in primary palatoplasty

Mary-Helen Mahoney et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The authors present a single surgeon's series of primary palatoplasty over a 10-year period in order to determine which presurgical factors might influence postoperative fistula rate and speech outcome.

Methods: Data were prospectively acquired for all patients undergoing primary palatoplasty between January of 2000 and January of 2010. Standard demographic data were captured together with classification of cleft type and severity (as defined by palate length and cleft width). Outcome data were assessed in terms of fistula rate and the requirement for secondary speech surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Results: There were 485 primary procedures; 276 patients were male. Mean age at primary surgery was 20.4 months. Clefts were classified according to Kernahan and Stark (cleft palate, n = 260; cleft lip/palate, n = 225) and Veau class (I, n = 85; II, n = 175; III, n = 165; and IV, n = 60). Palate length was assessed according to Randall's classification (I, n = 81; II, n = 319; III, n = 58; IV, n = 2). Mean palate width was 7.7 mm (range, 0 to 19 mm). Cleft lip/palate was associated with wider mean cleft width and a higher incidence of shorter palates than cleft palate. Velopharyngeal insufficiency was more frequent in cleft lip/palate than in cleft palate. Male sex, greater cleft width, and shorter palate length were independent predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Conclusions: Distributions of sex, cleft width, and palate length vary among the differing cleft types and may explain some of the variation in outcomes among centers and protocols. These data should be recorded to facilitate valid comparisons among future studies.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Risk, III.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sullivan SR, Marrinan EM, LaBrie RA, Rogers GF, Mulliken JB. Palatoplasty outcomes in nonsyndromic patients with cleft palate: A 29-year assessment of one surgeon’s experience. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(Suppl 1):612–616
    1. Gillet DA, Clarke HM. The hybrid palatoplasty: A preliminary report. Canadian J Plast Surg. 1996;4:157–160
    1. Sommerlad BC. A technique for cleft palate repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1542–1548
    1. Fisher DM, Sommerlad BC. Cleft lip, cleft palate, and velopharyngeal insufficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:342e–360e
    1. Bezuhly M, Fischbach S, Klaiman P, Fisher DM. Impact of 22q deletion syndrome on speech outcomes following primary surgery for submucous cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:502e–510e

Publication types

MeSH terms