Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jul;132(1):159e-167e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182910cf4.

Medical specialty society-sponsored data registries: opportunities in plastic surgery

Affiliations
Review

Medical specialty society-sponsored data registries: opportunities in plastic surgery

Keith M Hume et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Clinical data registries are commonly used worldwide and are implemented for a variety of purposes ranging from physician or facility clinic logs for tracking patients, to collecting outcomes data, to measuring quality improvement or safety of medical devices. In the United States, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has used data collected through registries to facilitate the drug and device regulatory process, for ongoing surveillance during the product life cycle, and for disease appraisals. Furthermore, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in certain instances, bases registry participation and submitting data to registries as factors for reimbursement decisions. The purpose of this article is to discuss the use of clinical data registries; the role that medical specialty societies, in particular, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and The Plastic Surgery Foundation, can have in the development and management of registries; and the opportunities for registry use in plastic surgery. As outcomes data are becoming essential measures of quality health care delivery, participation in registry development and centralized data collection has become a critical task for plastic surgery to engage in to proactively participate in the national quality and performance measurement agenda.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
National Plastic Surgery Centralized Data Repository and Data Integration Vision

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, editors. AHRQ Publication No.10- EHC049. 2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Sep, 2010. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. (Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc. d/b/a Outcome] under Contract No. HHSA29020050035I TO3.) - PubMed
    1. Brennan JM, Edwards FH, Zhao Y, et al. Early anticoagulation of bioprosthetic aortic valves in older patients: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery National Database. Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Sep 11;60(11):971–7. - PubMed
    1. Brennan JM, Edwards FH, Zhao Y, et al. Long-term survival after aortic valve replacement among high-risk elderly patients in the United States: insights from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, 1991 to 2007. Circulation. 2012 Sep 25;126(13):1621–9. - PubMed
    1. Ceppa DP, Kosinski AS, Berry MF, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy has increasing benefit in patients with poor pulmonary function: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database analysis. Ann Surg. 2012 Sep;256(3):487–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dibardino DJ, Pasquali SK, Hirsch JC, et al. Effect of sex and race on outcome in patients undergoing congenital heart surgery: An analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2012 Aug 9; - PMC - PubMed

Publication types