Using tablet computers compared to interactive voice response to improve subject recruitment in osteoporosis pragmatic clinical trials: feasibility, satisfaction, and sample size
- PMID: 23807841
- PMCID: PMC3685447
- DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S44551
Using tablet computers compared to interactive voice response to improve subject recruitment in osteoporosis pragmatic clinical trials: feasibility, satisfaction, and sample size
Abstract
Introduction: Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) provide large sample sizes and enhanced generalizability to assess therapeutic effectiveness, but efficient patient enrollment procedures are a challenge, especially for community physicians. Advances in technology may improve methods of patient recruitment and screening in PCTs. Our study looked at a tablet computer versus an integrated voice response system (IVRS) for patient recruitment and screening for an osteoporosis PCT in community physician offices.
Materials and methods: We recruited women ≥ 65 years of age from community physician offices to answer screening questions for a hypothetical osteoporosis active comparator PCT using a tablet computer or IVRS. We assessed the feasibility of these technologies for patient recruitment as well as for patient, physician, and office staff satisfaction with the process. We also evaluated the implications of these novel recruitment processes in determining the number of primary care practices and screened patients needed to conduct the proposed trial.
Results: A total of 160 women (80% of those approached) agreed to complete the osteoporosis screening questions in ten family physicians' offices. Women using the tablet computer were able to complete all screening questions consistently and showed a nonsignificant trend towards greater ease of use and willingness to spend more time in their physician's office compared to those using IVRS. Using the proportion of women found to be eligible in this study (almost 20%) and other eligibility scenarios, we determined that between 240 and 670 community physician offices would be needed to recruit ample patients for our hypothetical study.
Conclusion: We found good satisfaction and feasibility with a tablet computer interface for the recruitment and screening of patients for a hypothetical osteoporosis PCT in community office settings. In addition, we used this experience to estimate the number of research sites needed for such a study.
Keywords: clinical trial; computer applications; osteoporosis; pragmatic clinical trials.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A pragmatic randomized trial comparing tablet computer informed consent to traditional paper-based methods for an osteoporosis study.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Feb 17;3:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.02.003. eCollection 2016 Aug 15. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016. PMID: 29736454 Free PMC article.
-
Recruitment of physician offices for an office-based adolescent smoking cessation study.Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Jun;7(3):405-12. doi: 10.1080/14622200500125567. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005. PMID: 16085508 Clinical Trial.
-
One size does not fit all: Insights for engaging front-line clinicians in pragmatic clinical trials.Learn Health Syst. 2020 Oct 13;5(4):e10248. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10248. eCollection 2021 Oct. Learn Health Syst. 2020. PMID: 34667873 Free PMC article.
-
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42. Pediatrics. 2001. PMID: 11533360 Clinical Trial.
-
Screening and brief intervention for alcohol and other abuse.Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2014 Apr;25(1):126-56. Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2014. PMID: 25022191 Review.
Cited by
-
Individualized decision aid for diverse women with lupus nephritis (IDEA-WON): A randomized controlled trial.PLoS Med. 2019 May 8;16(5):e1002800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002800. eCollection 2019 May. PLoS Med. 2019. PMID: 31067237 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 22;2(2):MR000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29468635 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL): study protocol of a multi-site implementation trial with observational, case study design : Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus.Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Mar 11;2(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00118-9. Implement Sci Commun. 2021. PMID: 33706813 Free PMC article.
-
A review of approaches to improve participation of culturally and linguistically diverse populations in clinical trials.Trials. 2016 May 26;17(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1384-3. Trials. 2016. PMID: 27229153 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR reporting checklist: a systematic methodology review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02195-5. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024. PMID: 38589803 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003;290(12):1624–1632. - PubMed
-
- Ware JH, Hamel MB. Pragmatic trials – guides to better patient care? N Engl J Med. 2011;364(18):1685–1687. - PubMed
-
- Prescott RJ, Counsell CE, Gillespie WJ, et al. Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(20):1–143. - PubMed
-
- Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R, et al. HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(18):1809–1822. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources